Rough running 413 in Bill's 59
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Rough running 413 in Bill's 59



Bill's 413 has been discussed before.  The engine does not eat tons of oil and
does not pour clouds of blue smoke, as I recall.  At worse, the engine needs a
valve job.  At best, it has a vacuum leak.  The overheating problem is probably
not connected to the condition of the rings or the valves.  The coolant
passages in the block are probably dirty and need to be cleaned, or the
thermostat is sticky, or something of that nature.  230F reported previously is
not that terrible (but it is certainly hotter than it was meant to be).  These
iron-iron engines can take that.  But you should use a heavier oil (like 20w50)
until you fix the problem.

D^2

Quoting RandalPark@xxxxxxx:

> Was this booster tested before it was replaced? If is was leaking, then it
> would have at least contributed to the problem. If it wasn't leaking, then
> replacing it would obviously not have improved the situation.
> 
> Paul
> 
> In a message dated 5/6/2004 9:13:59 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
> hugtrees@xxxxxxxx writes:
> 
> > My heart goes out to you, Bill.  I suspected all along the broken brake
> booster was a red herring. And I'm afraid that I agree that you need to get
> the whole engine done, if necessary, and not just the top end.  I did the top
> end of engine and, sure enough, the bottom end went out pretty quickly
> afterwards.  There are some elements of your circumstance that I do not fully
> grasp which would probably make me want to get at least a second opinion, if
> only to satisfy nagging doubts that the job is really what is called for.
> >  
> > My total rebuild  was not temperature or bad running related.  I lost the
> rings on several cylinders.  This led to a lot of smoky blow by, but other
> than that, there were no symptoms.  I was also losing oil from the worn out
> oil filter canister and the rear main seal.  Surprisingly, performance was
> not unduly affected, though I think gas mileage was worse than before.
> >  
> > I can see how poor valves might affect performance but I'd like to know how
> it is causing the overheating.  Maybe you already have the information, but I
> would want to know more, if only to help me get over having to bite the
> bullet yet again.
> >  
> > I, too, have invested more money than is in any way related to the value of
> the car.  I suspect that this is the case for many people on this list.  I
> hope the mechanic you trust is very familiar with things Mopar.  I say this
> because I truly felt the substitution of a GM alternator was a very bad idea.
>  There were better, less intrusive, alternatives and I think you really need
> to take this car to someone who really understands and appreciates how Mopars
> work.  I take different makes of cars to different shops.  Our 63 Lincoln, a
> real money pit, goes to one place, our GM products to another.  I would not
> take the Imperial to either.
> >  
> > Your statement, 'He could give the car a valve job, but that wasn't going
> to cure bad rings, and would only make the bottom of the engine blow out that
> much faster,'  is the main cause for my concern.  It seems like muddy
> thinking that is not consistent with your situation.  This may be due to a
> lack of understanding on my part, or perhaps you reduced a long conversation
> to a snippet, and, as a result, may not be perfectly conveying what was
> said.
> >  
> > In my limited experience, high operating temperatures have been caused by a
> poor radiator or running the engine way too lean a fuel mixture.  Several
> people, in response to your first post pointed towards the carburetor and I
> tended to agree.  I would be sorely tempted to get the car properly tuned and
> see what if that makes a difference.  What other problems are you
> experiencing that leads to the conclusion you have poor valves and rings? 
> I'm the kind of person who really needs to just about have a gun put to my
> head before I'd totally tear down an engine completely just because it was
> running a little rough, and I'd sure  want to get every question settled in
> my mind before I did something so drastic.
> >  
> > I had to re tune my engine once I had a brake booster that would hold
> vacuum.  This was years before the other problems that did lead to needing to
> get the engine rebuilt and, in my case, there was no connection between the
> two events.
> >  
> > I wish you all the luck in the world.  A rebuilt engine is a good thing to
> have.  You will probably want to repaint the interior of your engine
> compartment once it is out and you know what will happen then, don't you? 
> Watch out for those 
> > "Might as well" projects!
> >  
> > Hugh
> 
> 


Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.