Right you are! I sent a note to the owner asking that very question. The underhood shot doesn't give the impression that anything "strange" has been done to the engine, so I am guessing that it is an error. I will post back when I hear from the owner of the car. >From the ad, that looks like a VERY nice '66! Paul In an email dated Mon, 1 Mar 2004 6:46:26 pm GMT, "Kate Triplett" <ad_ablurr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >Ok all you Imperialists who know more than I do - I had been under the >impression (for the past 30-plus years) that the 66 Imperial had 440 as the >standard and only engine. Per text in this listing, this "kept all original" >caar has a new 318.... > >http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2463919658&category=43905 > >Personally I think a 318 would be a tad underpowered in a 66, as I remember >that my old 66 (30-plus years ago, admittedly) was a pretty big car. > > >Kate Justet Triplett >Kate's Custom Gunleather >Monroe, Washington >Proudly a member of NRA >and owner of "Lucille" 1968 Crown 4 door HT > > >----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com ----------------- >This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please >reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be >shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the >Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm > >