Of vacuum brake boosters
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Of vacuum brake boosters



You are exactly correct Hugh.

There are two chambers involved here and four "seals".  You have dealt only
with the bellows inside the chamber.

There is a seal at the front, where the rod passes through the front housing
of the booster.  There is a seal in the centre (mor accurately a valve)
where the rod passes through the bellows.  There is a seal at the rear where
the rod passes through the rear of the booster.
There is the bellows themselves causing a seal near the centre of the
booster.

If the bellows themselves leak, you are correct in that nothing will be
noticed until you depress the brake pedal.  At that point, rather than
vacuum being maintained in front of the bellows and atmospheric pressure
allowed to act onthe rear of the bellows to create "assist", the effect will
be somewhat deminished and if the leak is sufficient, the engine may stumble
due to a lean mixture condition on cyl 8.(vacuum tree is located nearest cyl
8 on 440, YMMV)

If the seal in the centre of the unit leaks, you'll see much the same effect
unless the issue is compounded by a rear sea leakage, in which case you will
feel very little assist and will notice engine stumble continuously.

If the front seal leaks, you will feel diminished assist and will notice
engine stumble continuously.  I recently "patched" up this problem on one of
my cars in a way that seems to be working perfectly for the past 5 months or
so.  I separated the master cylinder from the booster and pulled it ahead
about an inch.  I then laid a nice thick gasket of black RTV sealant onto
the face of the booster.  I pushed the master cylinder back into place and
bolted it down.  This ended my engine stumble and improved brake assist.
This is of course a patch to a problem that was never solved.  I do have
intentions to replace the booster at some point.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Hugh & Therese" <hugtrees@xxxxxxxx>
To: "Imperial Mailing List" <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 12:24 PM
Subject: IML: Fw: Of vacuum brake boosters


There is a gap in my understanding that makes me puzzled every time a
certain answer is given.  A member has a 1959 with a failed brake booster.
The type resembles a rubber concertina, connected directly to the brake
pedal.  The way it should work is as follows.  Once the engine is turned on,
vacuum is created in a largish tank on the interior side wall of the car,
adjacent to, but separate from, the actual brake booster,  When the brakes
are applied, a valve opens in the booster itself and the air within the
rubber concertina is rapidly pulled out by the tank, which is held at vacuum
by the engine just for this purpose.  When the brakes are released, the
valve is closed and vacuum is discontinued within the bellows unit, allowing
it to return to its former position, full of air.

 I hope this is an effective, if somewhat crude, way of explaining its
operation.

 So, I am puzzled when it is stated that a leak or breach in the bellows
unit
is given as a reason for an engine to run rough at idle.  This runs counter
to my experience.  When I has a similar breach in mine, it had no effect on
the engine unless I pressed the brake pedal.  I surmise, apparently
incorrectly, that with the valve in the booster unit closed, vacuum in the
separate tank is just fine, and the breach in the bellows unit is not
affecting the engine because it is not in use, or not part of the system,
until the pedal is pressed in and the valve is opened.  At that point,
obviously, the leak is pretty bad and all vacuum is lost.  Prior to this
action, however, surely there is no vacuum in the bellows unit anyway, so a
breach in the unit cannot affect the engine.

I am always thrown by folks saying their booster unit leak is affecting
engine performance.  I cannot see how this can be and look forward to
learning how what seems to me to be improbable is actually taking place.
Also, I wonder why the breach that I have had in my bellows unit never
affected the engine until I pressed the brake pedal.

 Hugh
58 Imperial, with a newly replaced bellows unit




Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.