----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 10:17
PM
Subject: Re: IML: Bad news for my
'59
I'm kind of curious, what does he mean by "poor combustion"?
Did he mean compression?
Has the compression been checked on those or any other
cylinders?
If it was me, I'd fix the brake booster, or at least
temporarily, plug the vacuum feed to the booster.
Does the car run better, or differently? Be advised that
much more brake pedal effort will be needed to stop the car. Your engine may
indeed be worn out, but you can also get the same symptoms from a motor out of
tune or many other various problems. If the compression is ok, or at least,
not too far off from what the rest are putting out, the cylinders should fire.
Besides, a compression check is a good tool for judging engine condition, at
least where ring and valve seat seal is concerned. If he could do a
compression test, it would tell a lot, if you can get the numbers and post
back here. Its just that I hate to throw in the towel and rebuild an engine
unless I'm positive there isn't something else causing driveability
problems.
Phil <><
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 11:23
PM
Subject: IML: Bad news for my '59
Today I received the bad news from my
mechanic that my '59 Imperial has very poor combustion from two cylinders
now, and a leak in the brake booster, which would account for its lack of
power lately, and poor braking. Now I am faced with the decision to either
rebuild the engine, and brake booster, which will cost anywhere in the area
of $5,000.00 for the engine alone, or store the car for a while until I have
some time to shop around, and accumulate the funds for this undertaking. I
am going towards storing the car, since it is becoming difficult to keep
driving, having to put it in neutral at each stop light so the engine does
not die out. My question is does 5 grand sound like a lot to rebuild an
engine, and that is most likely the minimum with this mechanic?
Bill '59
Crown