When I put my '63 LeBaron into Park and the neutral
switch kicks in, the car still rolls. Appearantly,
Neutral works just fine. The transmission itself was
rebuilt a few years ago. The archive was some help
but I still couldn't find the source of the problem.
Any info. is appreciated.
Thanks.
Jim Brown
--- List Server <mailing-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> This is the digest version of the Imperial Mailing
> List. To receive messages individually, send an
> email to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with the
> following in the body of your message:
>
> set mode standard mailing-list
>
> To unsubscribe entirely, visit:
> http://imperialclub.com/IML-Specific/unsubscribe.htm
>
> If you have been switched to digest mode without
> your consent and you want to know why, visit:
> http://imperialclub.com/IML-Specific/autodigest.htm
>
>
> |
> |
> |
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ~~~~IML DIGEST~~~~~~~~~~~~~~MESSAGE
> SEPARATOR~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> |
> |
> |
>
> Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 17:04:39 -0700
> Subject: Re: IML: Platinum plugs - resisting
> fouling?
> From: Christopher Hoffman <imperial67@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reply-To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> James,
>
> I've found that none of my older Mopars (and that's
> 1993 and older) likes
> platinum plugs, even the Autolites. A rough idle was
> the most noticeable
> undesirable effect. And with standard Autolite plugs
> so cheap (and all but
> one so easy to replace), the result seems far more
> satisfactory overall with
> the non-platinum plugs, from my experience.
>
> Chris in LA
> 67 Crown
> 78 NYB
>
> |
> |
> |
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ~~~~IML DIGEST~~~~~~~~~~~~~~MESSAGE
> SEPARATOR~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> |
> |
> |
>
> Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 22:45:31 -0600
> From: Bob Zubkowski <bzubkow@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: IML: 2003 Eagle
> Reply-To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>
> --Boundary_(ID_qv0Y2VXU33ytk6zAlbebFQ)
> Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
> Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
>
> I think most of the car is fine. Get rid of the
> three tail lights and come up with something truely
> Imperial, maybe just the sparrow strainers. I also
> agree with the flightsweep deck lid.
> The drawing seems to show no head room for drive or
> rear passenger and no leg room in the rear. The
> cross over bar should go with larger rear full
> opening windows. We are dealing with an Imperial
> which is luxury, room, style and more class than
> anything on the road. I love the orginal front end
> and large rear fenders with the upper lights. The
> front end does look too large compared with the
> rear. My next question is what will it cost and who
> can afford it.
> Zub
>
> --Boundary_(ID_qv0Y2VXU33ytk6zAlbebFQ)
> Content-type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
> Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
>
> <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0
> Transitional//EN">
> <HTML><HEAD>
> <META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html;
> charset=iso-8859-1">
> <META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1141"
> name=GENERATOR>
> <STYLE></STYLE>
> </HEAD>
> <BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I think most of the car
> is fine. Get rid of the
> three tail lights and come up with something truely
> Imperial, maybe just the
> sparrow strainers. I also agree with the flightsweep
> deck lid.</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2> The drawing seems
> to show no head room for
> drive or rear passenger and no leg room in the rear.
> The cross over bar
> should go with larger rear full opening windows. We
> are dealing with an Imperial
> which is luxury, room, style and more class than
> anything on the road. I love
> the orginal front end and large rear fenders with
> the upper lights. The front
> end does look too large compared with the rear. My
> next question is what will it
> cost and who can afford it.</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=Arial
> size=2>Zub</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
>
> --Boundary_(ID_qv0Y2VXU33ytk6zAlbebFQ)--
> |
> |
> |
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ~~~~IML DIGEST~~~~~~~~~~~~~~MESSAGE
> SEPARATOR~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> |
> |
> |
>
> From: "Ernie Stepney" <stepney@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: IML: Platinum plugs - resisting
> fouling?
> Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 22:00:30 -0700
> Reply-To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> You might want to try a hotter heat range standard
> plug. That should
> help extend the life before fouling.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mailing-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:mailing-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Christopher
> Hoffman
> Sent: April 12, 2003 5:05 PM
> To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: IML: Platinum plugs - resisting
> fouling?
>
>
> James,
>
> I've found that none of my older Mopars (and that's
> 1993 and older)
> likes platinum plugs, even the Autolites. A rough
> idle was the most
> noticeable undesirable effect. And with standard
> Autolite plugs so cheap
> (and all but one so easy to replace), the result
> seems far more
> satisfactory overall with the non-platinum plugs,
> from my experience.
>
> Chris in LA
> 67 Crown
> 78 NYB
>
>
>
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network