resending, something went awry Dick Benjamin ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dick Benjamin" <DickB@xxxxxxxxx> To: <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 9:55 AM Subject: Re: IML: '67 Imp with a '68 nose > The 915 heads are the earlier design, and some, including me, feel that they > give a much better throttle response than the later, 906 heads, as the > passages are somewhat smaller, and do not have some of the smog provisions > cast into the passageways. Others argue that the 906 heads, used from late > 67 (?) on give better overall performance, with better breathing at high RPM > due to larger passages. I have cars with both, and prefer the early heads, > as do some MOPAR big block performance folk. But I drive my cars as a > regular daily driver, not a race car, and I seldom exceed 80 MPH. > > By the way, the "915" or "906" or whatever number refers to the last 3 > digits of the casting number. > > Dick Benjamin > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Edmund Villasana" <edmundv@xxxxxxxxx> > To: <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 8:43 AM > Subject: Re: IML: '67 Imp with a '68 nose > > > > I'll check the heads when we pull them, but I have a question. What are > 915 > > heads and why would it be good that I had them? (sorry, like I said, I > am > > new to the world of Imperials and big blocks) > > Eddie > > Villasana > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Dick Benjamin <DickB@xxxxxxxxx> > > To: <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 10:36 AM > > Subject: Re: IML: '67 Imp with a '68 nose > > > > > > > Some of us (OK, maybe just me) would be interested to know whether your > > car > > > has 915 heads like some 67s, or some other head. Would you take a look > at > > > the 7 digit cast-in number that shows up when you take the valve covers > > off > > > and let us know the number on the heads? Thanks. > > > > > > Dick Benjamin > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Edmund Villasana" <edmundv@xxxxxxxxx> > > > To: <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 10:45 PM > > > Subject: Re: IML: '67 Imp with a '68 nose > > > > > > > > > Thank you very much for the info!!! My dad and I went out to the car > and > > > got under it to check everything out and make sure the frame and > > suspension > > > was sound and found good news: its all straight and unharmed. I found > > out > > > that the first owner's wife had "bumped" the grill and fender and the > body > > > shop used what they could get to repair the car. I was very happy to > find > > > out that the damage had only been cosmetic. After thinking about it for > a > > > while I decided that I liked the 68 front clip on the 67, it gives the > car > > > character,lol. I'm sending the heads in to get them reworked next > weekend > > > and I will be back on the road with my 1/2 67 Imperial in two weeks. > > > > > > Thanks > > > again, > > > > > > Eddie V. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: William Herbert > > > To: Imperial > > > Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 10:37 PM > > > Subject: Re: IML: '67 Imp with a '68 nose > > > > > > > > > It could be that 68 parts were readily available when repair time > came.. > > > The blessed internet..was not always so useful and available to us. > > People > > > probably used what they could find and was expedient. Not such a > > sin....ask > > > Brad about his Newporker! > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: Christopher Hoffman > > > Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 11:16 PM > > > To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Subject: Re: IML: '67 Imp with a '68 nose > > > > > > Welcome, Edmund... > > > > > > Since some of the follow-ups to this didn't seem to note the > magnitude > > > of > > > Dick's statement, you'd need to swap out the entire front end of the > > > car, > > > except for the hood (I'm talking bodywork only here, of course). > > > > > > The front fenders do not interchange between '67 and '68. The bottom > > > edge of > > > the '68 fender goes straight across from the front wheel arch to the > > > bottom > > > of the grille, whereas the '67 fender dips down to accommodate the > "J" > > > shape > > > of the wraparound bumper. > > > > > > As far as front-end bodywork goes, only the hoods interchange. And > > even > > > so, > > > the '67 has a hole for a stand-up eagle medallion (the actual > > medallion, > > > not > > > the mid-80s AMC-Renault car) and the '68 windsplit extends down the > > > front > > > edge of the hood. > > > > > > Sounds like someone put the front clip of a '68 on this '67... as > Dick > > > noted, the most obvious reason to do this is to repair a wrecked > front > > > end, > > > so a thorough check of the mechanical stuff underneath the > mismatched > > > bodywork would be worthwhile. > > > > > > For now, consider your car unique! > > > > > > Chris in LA > > > 67 Crown > > > 78 NYB Salon > > > > > > Dick Benjamin (DickB@xxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > > > It is a simple bolt-on job to replace the front end sheetmetal of > a > > 67 > > > with > > > > 68 equivalents, the only problem being that the side trim is > > > different, and > > > > you will have side marker lights in the front and not in the back. > > > > > > > > > > > > ----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com ----------------- > > > This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please > > > reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be > > > shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the > > > Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com ----------------- > > > This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please > > > reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be > > > shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the > > > Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm > > > > > > > > >