Should be about 6 inches shorter, the difference in the length of the bumper guards. --- Gregory Gryczan & Sandra Hudson Gryczan <gregandsandra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello List, > > I fondly recall parallel parking my '73 in Chicago > parking spaces. Sadly, > I believe this is becoming a lost art. Where does > the '72 fall on the > list? Thanks. > > Greg Gryczan > West Palm Beach, FL > U.S.A. > > At 08:18 PM 8/30/2002 -0400, you wrote: > >Size DOES matter when it comes to Imperials! At > 235.3", the Imperial > >finally bested those other so-called "luxury makes" > of the mid-seventies. > >A while back I was curious to see where mine ranked > in the upper echelons > >of barge-iness. Here's a ranking of some > outstanding biggies: > > > >1973 Imperial LeBaron: 235.3" > >1976 Cadillac Fleetwood Brougham: 233.7" (longest > wheelbase-133") > >1976 Buick Electra 225: 233.3" > >1977 Lincoln Town Car: 233.0" > >1978 Chrysler New Yorker Brougham: 231.0" > >1979 Lincoln Continental Mark V: 230.3" > >1971 Imperial LeBaron: 229.7" > >1975 Mercury Grand Marquis: 229.0" > >1976 Lincoln Continental Mark IV: 228.1" > >1964 Imperial LeBaron: 227.8" > >1977 Oldsmobile Toronado: 227.5" > >1959 Imperial Crown: 226.3" (widest-81") > >1971 Chrysler New Yorker: 224.7" > >1976 Cadillac Eldorado: 224.1" > >1964 Buick Electra: 222.8" > > > >And a few random others: > > > >1972 Buick Riviera: 218.3" > >1992 Buick Roadmaster: 215.8" > >1981 Chrysler Imperial: 213.3" > >1993 Mercury Grand Marquis: 212.4" > >1983 Chrysler Cordoba: 210.1" > >1964 Buick Riviera: 208.1" > >1985 Cadillac Eldorado: 204.8" > >1964 Buick Skylark: 203.5" > >1997 Mercury Cougar: 199.7" > >1997 Chrysler Sebring: 191.1" > >1994 Chrysler LeBaron wagon: 179.9" > > > >Neal Herman > >1959 Imperial Crown > >1972 Buick Riviera > >1983 Chrysler Cordoba > > > > > >> [Original Message] > >> From: Currell Pattie <currellpattie@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >> To: <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Date: 8/30/2002 6:24:59 PM > >> Subject: IML: Length of '73 Imperial > >> > >> At 235.3" (19 feet 7+ inches), it was a big one. > Can't say it was the > >> longest, however, for standard sedans, anyway. It > may be. I'm thinking of > >> those Continental Town Sedans of the era; maybe > they came up an inch or > >two > >> short. Big Mothers too, by any criteria. > >> > >> The largest wheelbase on a standard (non limo or > commercial chassis) > >sedan > >> was the 34-37 Cadillac V-16s, at 154". The '73 > Imperial is 127",. > >However, > >> the Caddy had its wheels pretty much at each > corner, where the Imperial > >had > >> some, ahem, overhang. So the Imperial probably > was longer, overall. > >> > >> By the way, has anyone ever noted the square > footage of the trunks on the > >> 69-73 Imperial Coupes? They look like El Caminos > if you squint, and > >pretend > >> that there is an open bed back there. > >> > >> You could land a helicopter on them. And the > legroom in the back seat, at > >> least for the coupes, isn't that great. The > overall length of the Coupe > >> might be an inch or so smaller than the 235.3" > for the sedan, but still... > >> > >> Not the greatest use of space in automotive > history, anyway. > >> > >> Currell > > > > > > > >