I was LUCKY a few weeks back and ran into a deal where
I ended up with a COMPLETE set of these cross rams,
long casting, spacers, exhaust manifolds, and risers.
Included was another partial set AND a 60 Chrysler
(non Imp) that runs. Really fell into it and got a
great deal. One set is going on my 57 Imperial
Roadster. The other will end up on Robert Soule's 65
300 after we fabricate the missing pieces.
Kerryp
--- "D. Dardalis" <dardal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> At 05:01 PM 1/20/2002 +0100, r.v.lent wrote:
>
> >But what will happen when I make an intake manifold
> like on the 300 D
> >with one carb on each side of the engine ( Yes I
> can make this myself )
> Even if you could cast a dual carb manifold
> yourself, I would not recommend
> it. There is a lot of "science" into designing an
> intake manifold. There
> are lots and lots of parameters (like air flow off
> the carb, and Air/Fuel
> distribution) that its highly unlikely you will get
> it right by
> chance. The OEM's back then did these designs by
> trial and error, and with
> lots of the engines on the dyno, they tried to come
> up with the best
> compromised design. Now, these things are simulated
> in computers removing
> most of the required prototyping and testing. Also,
> nowadays with port
> injection, their work is somewhat simplified since
> they do not need to
> worry about A/F distribution and gasoline droplets
> accumulating or staying
> atomized, or manifold heating, etc.
> >The long runners were optimized for high rpm use
> and would run poorly as a
> >street engine. A lot like running a tunnel ram
> manifold on the street.
> Correct, but this refers to the later model ram
> manifolds on the 413s. I
> don't think that ram manifolds were installed on the
> early Hemis... These
> ram manifolds are even tougher to design since there
> is an additional
> parameter, the pressure waves. Also, due to the
> long distance between the
> carbs and the ports, it must be a real design
> headache to ensure good fuel
> atomization. That proves the advanced engineering
> of Chrysler...
> D^2
>
>
>
>
>