Re: IML: Ranking of models and packages
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IML: Ranking of models and packages
- From: PAUL WENTINK <randalpark@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 09:45:14 -0500
It is also worth mentioning that when this line up began, Imperial
wanted to match Cadillac model for model. Custom, Crown, and LeBaron
corresponded with the Sixty Two, DeVille, and Fleetwood series
Cadillacs. Imperial didn't offer as many body styles in each series as
Cadillac did. For example, the only Imperial convertible was in the
Crown series, while Cadillac had one for each. They really intended to
give GM a run for the money, offering many body style choices in each
series with very impressive and exclusive nomenclature.
Paul W.
-----Original Message-----
From: Marty Trendler <mtnose@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 2:47 am
Subject: Re: IML: Ranking of models and packages
Hi David,
Example:
Plymouth had three model levels: Savoy, Belvadere, and Fury. Each
model progressively had a more deluxe interior and exterior package.
Imperial had the same system named Custom, Crown and LeBaron. Each
Model also cost progressively more. For the most part, aside from the
trim packages, the cars were the same with standard options for each
model. The styles can vary Sedan, Southampton, four door, two door,
hard top, etc. The Convertibles usually were a Crown two door only.
Almost every interior package had many color and texture options along
with secondary mechanical options, that could be ordered at the
dealer, so each and every car is unique onto its self. LeBarons would
have sold for more new, but convertibles are getting a better resale
today. I find that a cars value is a combination of it's original
design, unique options and level of correct restoration (or original
condition).
Hope this gives clarity.
Imperially Yours,
Marty Trendler
Red Bluff, Ca.
1959 Imperial LeBaron 4 Door Sedan
----- Original Message ----
From: David Randall <david.randall@xxxxxxx>
To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Saturday, February 9, 2008 8:28:01 AM
Subject: IML: Ranking of models and packages
Folks,
I've searched on the site and elsewhere for this info, and maybe I
missed
it, but I don't quite understand the rakings of models and/or packages
in
the Imperial line. In the '61s for example, where does a LeBaron sit
vs. a
Crown or Southampton?
Thanks,
David
'78 NYB coupe
----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com ; -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to iml.webmonster@xxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
________________________________________________________________________
More new features than ever. Check out the new AOL Mail ! -
http://webmail.aol.com
----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to iml.webmonster@xxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network