RE: IML: HORSEPOWER
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: IML: HORSEPOWER



Interesting you should say that. I had a 74 Charger with a slant 6 and autotrans 20 some years ago. That thing could cruise all day at 75mph effortlessly and still make upwards of 25mpg. Not a light car, but I was amazed. And true, 1972 was when they plugged a Kirby into the power hole on American cars and sucked all the power out. I had a 68 galxi w/a 302 rated at 210hp and later had a 72 Turdrino w/ the same engine rated at 140...and it felt like 4cylinder power…truly gutless. It’s strange that a 440 would…oops, an Imperial’s 440 would be rated at 140 also. It seems like the hp in all the big cars w/huge engines dropped into the low 200s, but yeah, 140 does sound more like rear wheel horse.

 

From:  mrs954@xxxxxxx
. The best was a 74 Duster with automatic transmission. It seemed to have plenty of power for the weight of the car.

 

 

 

Dave

67 Haze (not missing any hp here) Green Sedan

Covington, WA

 

 

 



Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.