Re: IML: Safety- Old cars vs New cars
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IML: Safety- Old cars vs New cars



From: "DR CHALLENGER" <drchallenger@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: IML: Safety- Old cars vs New cars

problem is that old cars dont absorbe the energy of an impact and the
passengers  get the impact.

 Old cars don't absorb *as much* energy in a crash.
If you hit (or get hit by) a modern car in an old car, the modern car will do much of the crushing for you. In a collision, the heavier vehicle transfers most of the energy to the lighter vehicle (which, in this case, crushes). Hitting a tree is undoubtedly safer in a new car. Hitting a car, is often safer (wearing belts, of course) in an old car. Old car above is generally meant to mean _big_ old car. Big cars put more distance between you and the impact, so that helps a lot. A '63 Falcon is a lot less safe than a '63 Imperial in a crash, and the Falcon probably performs very poorly safety-wise compared to a modern car. A collision with something bigger and heavier than you is also probably much safer in a new car.

If I was in a crash between an (old) Imperial and a Honda Civic, though - I'd want to be in the Imperial.
      -Kle.
'69 Crown 4DHT



-----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm



Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.