http://imperialclub.com/Yr/1970/Emissions/Cover.htm This addresses the question in the first page and thereafter. -K --- Chris Strohmeyer <chrisstroh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Was this to cut emissions?? > > Chris > 67 Imperial > ----- Original Message ----- > From: RODGER D. REDDISH > To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Friday, December 29, 2006 11:58 AM > Subject: Re: IML: Imperial Air Cleaner Trivia > > > Hola Class > > To make it all in one statement, the 1963-1966 > Imperial Air cleaner Housing assembly is the same > part number. This unit was made with a "clean" tube > and one that had a fitting for the Calif Air Package > ( CAP ). They also had a dual tube snorkel that was > made in both manners for dual exhaust equipted cars. > > The later units starting in 1967 with the little > hole at the end of the long tapered snorkel is the > same as the industry of that era. By this time the > CAP equipted cars was a norm. The Dual Snorkel unit > was still with the OEM dual exhaust. > > Uncle Rodger & Aunt Gabby > COS > ----- Original Message ----- > From: john sadowski > To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Friday, December 29, 2006 1:52 AM > Subject: Re: IML: air cleaner > > > The 66 also has that style air cleaner. > John > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Chris Strohmeyer" > <chrisstroh@xxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 9:42 PM > Subject: Re: IML: air cleaner > > > >I hear K@N makes a filter without needing the > metal housing! It's all air > >filter. I can't imagine it not boosting your > HP. I wonder if those were > >smog only air cleaners in California? I read a > 1967 review of the Imperial > >that said they were surprized at the lack of HP > compared the the previous > >year. I wonder if this and the 5 degrees before > TDC timing instead of > >12-1/2 BTC is there way of cutting > emissions...and HP. > > > > Chris > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Ken Lang" <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > To: <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 8:12 PM > > Subject: RE: IML: air cleaner > > > > > >> > >> My 68 New Yorker (owned many years ago) had > the same air cleaner design. > >> It > >> didn't make sense to me how enough air could > get through that small > >> opening > >> especially when you compare it to hugh > opening in the top of the > >> carburetor. > >> > >> So to allow more air to get in I flipped the > entire air cleaner over and > >> drilled a string of 1/2" diameter holes > around the bottom just outside of > >> the filter element. Once the air cleaner was > back in place the holes > >> were > >> not visible and all air that came through the > new holes still had to go > >> through the filter element. > >> > >> To be quite honest, I don't know if I > improved anything or not. The car > >> still ran like a spotted ape and still got 10 > mpg. > >> > >> Ken > >> 67 Crown 4 Dr Ht > >> > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: mailing-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> [mailto:mailing-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > On Behalf Of Chris > >> Strohmeyer > >> Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 7:30 PM > >> To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> Subject: IML: air cleaner > >> > >> I'm curious, I notice my stock air cleaner > has the inlet "horn" that is > >> only > >> > >> about 1-1/2inches! Doesn't this choke the > engine on my 67 Imperial? > >> > >> Chris > >> > >> > >> > >> ----------------- > http://www.imperialclub.com ----------------- > >> This message was sent to you by the Imperial > Mailing List. Please > >> reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and > your response will be > >> shared with everyone. Private messages (and > attachments) for the > >> Administrators should be sent to > webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to > http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm > >> > >> > >> > >> ----------------- > http://www.imperialclub.com ----------------- > >> This message was sent to you by the Imperial > Mailing List. Please > >> reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and > your response will be > >> shared with everyone. Private messages (and > attachments) for the > >> Administrators should be sent to > webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to > http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm > >> > > > > > > > > ----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com > ----------------- > > This message was sent to you by the Imperial > Mailing List. Please reply to > > mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your > response will be shared with > > everyone. Private messages (and attachments) > for the > > Administrators should be sent to > webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to > http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm > > > > > > > > > ----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com > ----------------- > This message was sent to you by the Imperial > Mailing List. Please > reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your > response will be > shared with everyone. Private messages (and > attachments) for the > Administrators should be sent to > webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to > http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm > > Kenyon Wills __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com ----------------- This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm