Re: IML: 90-93 IMPERIAL
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IML: 90-93 IMPERIAL
- From: aeyn <mr85000@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 12:26:54 -0700 (PDT)
The 3.3 is a great little engine. We have a 92 Grand Voyager SE
with the 3.3 and a 97 Town & Country with the 3.8. I have
previously had a 90 Fifth Avenue with the 3.3 for 7 years and had
VERY little problems with it. I sort of think of the 3.3 (3.8 )
as a current "slant six" engine as to their reliability.
Æyn & Patrick
--- jlandis81044@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> HI CLUB,
> IN MY SEARCH FOR A 90-93 IMP, CAN I GET SOME FEEDBACK AS TO 3.3
> VS. 3.8 AND ALSO, DIGITAL DASH VS. ANALOG. I REALIZE THAT THE
> 3.8 WAS NOT AVAILABLE IN '90.
> ALSO, IS ONE YEAR CAR MORE RELIABLE THAN THE OTHERS?
> THANKS FOR YOUR FEEDBACK.
> JERRY LANDIS
>
>
>
> ----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com
> -----------------
> This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List.
> Please
> reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will
> be
> shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for
> the
> Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
>
>
----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network