Re: IML: intake manifold
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IML: intake manifold
- From: Kenyon Wills <imperialist1960@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:13:05 -0700 (PDT)
--- David Whitney <hazegreen66@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The advantage aluminum offers besides trivial weight
> savings is the added heat diffusion properties of
> the material over OEM steel.
Great point, David!
The stock cast iron manifold (at least on the early
413's) had a wad of fiberglass insulation under it and
on top of the intake valley pan/gasket. I was told
that this was to keep temps down and to avoid boiling
the gas in the carb bowls through conduction of heat.
I had problems with a car that didn't get the
insulation put back in on the first try...
The Edelbrock aluminum unit that I have for the
freshly rebuilt, "hot" engine I have sits high enough
to pass one's hand under with LOTS of airspace. I
have not installed the engine yet (week or so away),
but I am guessing that the taller height of the intake
will neccessitiate an air cleaner housing change.
I am told that they make ones that sink down
around/over the carb body to lower overall height.
The stock cleaner can also be a source of power
constriction - a 360-degree filter, although not very
original looking, may be another source of increased
breathing?
---
Speaking of carbs, ONE specific person likely to read
this owes me the one they promised me, so cough it up, OK?
Kenyon Wills
----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network