Re: IML: Imperial design

["A. Foster" <monkeypuzzle1@xxxxxxx>]

Rob;
  I am well aware that it is a computer generated rendering but I don't see
the relevance as to why there are no front or rear views as one could render
those just as easily, there may be some pending that haven't been posted as
yet. As I said before the general opinion that I heard expressed locally
about the recent concept Imperial was that it was ugly and that the
Challenger was quite attractive; this was an opinion expressed by members of
the lay public not Imperial enthusiests by the way.
Best Regards
Arran Foster
1954 Imperial Newport
Needing A left side tailight bezel and other trim parts.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Rob P" <fristpenny@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, May 22, 2006 2:43 AM
Subject: Re: IML: Imperial design


There aren't any frontal or rear shots because it's not a "car," it's a
computer drawing.  I can appreciate the work that went into it.....but, I
don't like it.  I think the rear overhang looks ridiculous.  The cab forward
thing with the wheels pushed out the edges has a purpose, long wheelbase
helps ride, and for whatever size car you have you will have a nicer ride.
The only trade-off is a worse turning circle.  In the US that isn't a
problem.   Most of the list is responding "that's an Imperial!" but when I
look at it all I can see is a 1990's era Buick Roadmaster.  A car I did not
particularly care for and more importantly to DCX, sold poorly to a VERY old
average buyer.  Not something car makers strive for.  Finally, it seems
counterproductive to have pronounced wheel arches to accentuate the wheels
and then stick skirts on to hide them.  The contradicting cues look silly to
me.  I think the designer started with a 300 and stretched and molded it.
You may not like the new Imperial concept, I'm no fan of that either, but it
caused a little stir.  At a show this car wouldn't draw a second glance
except for its (probably) huge size.

Rob

>From: "A. Foster" <monkeypuzzle1@xxxxxxx>
>Reply-To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: IML: Imperial design
>Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 20:51:19 -0700
>
>Hi All;
>  It's too bad there aren't any frontal or rear shots of this car, all
>things aside they have the proportions just about right. The tail end has a
>little too much overhang even by 70's car standards but compared to the
>Rolls clone bar of soap car that hit the cars shows it's a knock out.
>Speaking of the car show Imperial, everyone that I have run into that has
>seen  pictures of it thinks that it's ugly, and none of them have owned an
>Imperial or know much about their history.
>Best Regards
>Arran Foster
>1954 Imperial Newport
>Needing A Left Side Tailight Bezel and other trim parts.




-----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm





-----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please 
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be 
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm