You would have a hard time finding the law that outlawed Chrysler's
pushbuttons as there was no such law. The American federal government
did
not have the right to pass any legislation regarding auto equipment or
safety regulations until the enactment of the National Traffic and
Motor
Vehicle Safety Act and the Highway Safety Act in 1966. Those laws
enabled
the American government to establish the Department of Transportation
and
proceed to pass a multitude of laws concerning auto and highway
safety..
Chrysler dropped the pushbuttons for marketing reasons. Although
Chrysler
owners loved the buttons, GM and Ford owners were not so positive about
them. And if Chrysler wanted a bigger share of the American market,
they
would have to entice GM and Ford owners to buy Chrysler. And thus the
buttons died.
There were no standards set for automatic transmission gear selection
in the
1960's, contrary to what many believe. The P-R-N-D-L or P-R-N-D-2-1
quadrant was the accepted format for the Big Three - even Chrysler's
pushbuttons were R-B-D-2-l - but Studebaker hung onto the P-N-D-L-R
quadrant
to the very end in 1966. And Corvair's standard gear selector for its
Powerglide was a dash-mounted lever, just like Chrysler in 1955. And
next
time you get on a newer model transit bus - Gillig, Flyer, Orion,
etc., ask
the driver to shift his bus into neutral and then back into a forward
gear.
Watch him use pushbuttons to do it.
Until the passing of the above two laws, the Automobile Manufacturers
Association was the big power. It was the AMA that pushed for the
adoption
of sealed beam headlamps in 1939 and the quad headlamp system in
1956-57.
Again, it was not the federal government that approved them as they
had no
power over such matters until 1966.
Same as well for the adoption of such items as seat belts, padded
dashboards, anti-glare paint on dashboards and windshield surrounds,
day-night mirrors, driver's outside rearview mirrors, backup lights,
dual
braking systems - all these either appeared on cars or were approved
for
production prior to the enactment of the above acts due to the AMA.
Even
side marker lights/reflectors were not the result of any federal law,
which
is why Chrysler products had lights in 1968 and reflectors in 1969.
If you want to know what the federal government does say about
transmission
shift lever sequence, below is a quote from their regulations, first
announced December 2, 1971, and not sometime in 1963 or 1964:
.
From the Department of Transportation, Title 49: Transportation, [36
FR
22902, Dec. 2, 1971, as amended at 54 FR 29045, July 11, 1989; 56 FR
12471,
Mar. 26, 1991; 60 FR 13642, March 14, 1995] -
"PART 571-FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARDS
"Subpart B-Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards
"§ 571.102 Standard No. 102; Transmission shift lever sequence,
starter
interlock, and transmission braking effect.
"S3.1.4 Identification of shift lever positions.
"S3.1.4.1 Except as specified in S3.1.4.3, if the transmission shift
lever
sequence includes a park position, identification of shift lever
positions,
including the positions in relation to each other and the position
selected,
shall be displayed in view of the driver whenever any of the following
conditions exist:
"(a) The ignition is in a position where the transmission can be
shifted.
"(b) The transmission is not in park.
"S3.1.4.2 Except as specified in S3.1.4.3, if the transmission shift
lever
sequence does not include a park position, identification of shift
lever
positions, including the positions in relation to each other and the
position selected, shall be displayed in view of the driver whenever
the
ignition is in a position in which the engine is capable of operation.
"S3.1.4.3 Such information need not be displayed when the ignition is
in a
position that is used only to start the vehicle.
"S3.1.4.4 Effective September 23, 1991, all of the information
required to
be displayed by S3.1.4.1 or S3.1.4.2 shall be displayed in view of the
driver in a single location. At the option of the manufacturer,
redundant
displays providing some or all of the information may be provided."
As you can see, there is no concern as to the order the gears are
displayed,
only their visibility to the driver, with and without a park position
Bill
Vancouver, BC
----- Original Message -----
From: "Douglas Nieblas" <doug58imp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 4:43 PM
Subject: RE: IML: Please Welcome Returning Member, Douglas Nieblas
(1958)
The reason that they stopped making the push button automatics was not
women
breaking their nails. It was the federal government that passed
legistation
in 1965 to force all automakers to standardize the basic functions of
the
cars. It was easier for Chrysler to shift back to levers in the now
standard
pattern, than it would be to convince Ford and GM to swift to push
buttons.
Don't you think?
Doug
58 Crown coupe
From: "david simons" <simonsbud8@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: IML: Please Welcome Returning Member, Douglas Nieblas
(1958)
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 08:56:20 -0700
women complained the pushbutton transmissions broke their nails
-----Original Message-----
From: "mailing-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
<mailing-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of "ken brather"
<oef_1947_isf@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 2:21 PM
To: "mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: IML: Please Welcome Returning Member, Douglas Nieblas
(1958)
k. here saw a new yorker yesterday an 89. looks pretty much like an
imp
of the period guess there r suttle differanses. easeier to tell the
diff
tween new yorkers & imps from the early '< 70's on back. mid ' 70's
on
up more difficult to tell. i saw an ad 4 a 56 chrysler & y'all r
right.
there is no park designation. it showed a close up of the push button
shifter why did they stop making those? the edsel had them & when i
was
in college, i had a friend that had i think it was a valiant that had
this . been thinking what i like as my 1st imp if i could ever
afford 1.
you folks seem to have a lot of trouble w/ them my folks had a ' 71
new
yorker & had lot of trouble w/ back firing thru carberator.
----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network