thanks for the info,
the reason I asked the question was , I saw a 78 la baron with a 225 slant six engine in it, and I was wondering what year did the la barons separate from imperial, the car I'm talking about is what myself and most others would consider a mid size car but leaning more towards a compact car of that era.
my next question is this. if the la baron was the "cream of the crop" back in the 50s and 60s then why did Chrysler treat the name as a "stepchild" in the mid to late 70's
to me it doesn't make much sense, because in the 50's a 57 imperial La Baron would have sold for more than a custom or a crown. but then I see a 78 la-baron with a slant six , no offense to the slant six , but one would think it should have had a v8 in it.
my old 59 imperial has more options than the 78 la-baron, is it me or was Chrysler heading backwards in the late 70's and early 80s as far as technology and innovation.
Kenyon Wills <imperialist1960@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Would it be 1975/76 when Imperial died but the Le-Baron
model continued on? I saw one on what I guess was the
same platform as the ASPEN the other day and felt
sorry for it. It had eagles all over it, like
apparitions, but I didn't know the actual year. Sorta
like a diplomat, too.
-Kenyon
--- darrell kershaw
wrote:
> sorry for the double post. my question is
>
> in what year did the imperial and la baron separate?
Kenyon Wills
----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for
the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
