There is an article in the Wall Street Journal today stating that Ford
Motor Company is saying that tires have a life expectancy of 6 years and
should be replaced after that time interval. DaimlerChrysler AG
apparently has been saying this with their Mercedes models for some time
and just started recommending it with their 2005 Chrysler models. Other
manufacturers aren't as sure and as always, there are two sides to the
issue.
Those of us with Imperials that don't get driven very often may need to at
least consider this point of view. The tires on my 67 Convertible look
practically new and probably have less than 5,000 miles on them, but when
I checked the sales slip I realized that I bought them in 1988! That
means that these guys are about 17 years old. Other old car collectors
tell me they are changing their tires every ten years or so, worn out or
not. I'm beginning to think that there is something to this.
Any thoughts?
Ken Miller
61 and 67 Converts (that get driven a few hundred miles a year)
----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please reply to
mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be shared with
everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm