Re: IML: Unit-body vs body-on-frame
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IML: Unit-body vs body-on-frame



Title: Re: IML: Unit-body vs body-on-frame
OK, everyone... Probably time to take this to the Salon, or at least the Impala mailing list. I hope that a modern GM product is not the standard by which any vehicle is measured, by the way!

:) Chris in LA

On 2/25/05 1:41 PM, Woolf,Richard T(Contractor) (richard.woolf@xxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:

Henry, That brings up another point I had forgotten to mention. I work at Fort Dix, US Army base in New Jersey. The DOD Police (Dept. of Defense) are using the new Chevy Impalas which most of you should know is a unibody construction. The cars are not holing up from the daily use. Many of them are having body problems like what you mention with your unibody cars. The Ford Crown Vic's which is a body on frame design held up much better. I've talked to the New Jersey state troopers who uses the Fords, and don't have the problems they had with the unibody cars in the pass.



Just another thought I wanted to mention.



Rich Woolf



Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.