Re: IML: About Tom McCahill, and his judgement of the car in '67
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IML: About Tom McCahill, and his judgement of the car in '67



Let's hope that this will never reach the ears of our "friends"!  

D^2

Quoting Hugh & Therese <hugtrees@xxxxxxxx>:

> Dimitrios,
> 
> Are you suggesting that our friends in the demolition derby game should 
> start snapping up 67 & 68 Imperials?  And I thought you just liked racing 
> them on the roads!
> 
> Hugh
> TFIC
> (Tongue firmly in cheek)
> 
> 
> > Another unique feature of the 67-68's is the amazing strength of the
> > front structure.  Even though some folks in the demolition community seem 
> > to
> > prefer the earlier Imperials, the front end structure of the 67-68s is far
> 
> > more
> > reinforced, which means better safety and vehicle survivability in a rough
> > crush.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
> This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please 
> reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be 
> shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
> Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
> 
> 





-----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please 
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be 
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm



Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.