Re: IML: Roger- re 62 red imp from Arizona
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IML: Roger- re 62 red imp from Arizona






I would never pay a #2 price for a car with the wrong engine.  That's
counterintuitive to the #2 designation.

I recommend the seller install the proper engine (in #2 condition, of
course) and charge accordingly.  Otherwise, a discount is in order.

Is anything else on the car ersatz?  Vinyl where there should be leather?
Substandard carpet/pad?  #2 is #2.  If it's not, it's #3

-- David


                                                                                                                                              
                      "Steve B."                                                                                                              
                      <imperial59@xxxxxxxxx>          To:       mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx                                                 
                      Sent by:                        cc:                                                                                     
                      mailing-list-owner@imper        Subject:  Re: IML: Roger- re 62 red imp from Arizona                                    
                      ialclub.com                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                              
                      01/05/2005 04:07 PM                                                                                                     
                      Please respond to                                                                                                       
                      mailing-list                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                              




> I think that he indicated that the 36 meant that it was a 361 engine
instead of the >413. I believe that "cubically challenged" was his way of
saying that the engine is >probably too small. If the car runs good and the
price is right, it wouldn't bother >me that much.

I would normally agree with you but heres what bothers me on this one.
 The car is a strong #2 and priced accordingly.  If you were looking
at buying probably one of the finest 62's in existence would it bother
you if it had the wrong engine?

                     Steve B.


-----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm






-----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please 
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be 
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm



Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.