>From: Kenyon Wills <imperialist1960@xxxxxxxxx> >Subject: IML: Discs onto a 1962? -let sleeping dogs lie > >>Duckie26626@xxxxxxx wrote:P.S. Any try to Adapt Disk Brakes to the front of a 62????? > >Why re-engineer one of the best engineered cars on the planet for its time? I ask that sincerely and not as a sharp rebuttal. > >If you have insufficient brakes now, they need to be either replaced or re-adjusted. They were awfully >good from the factory, for what they were. I've had a '62 and a '63, and drove the '62 back from Texas to R.I., and then coast to coast. You're right, the brakes do a good job - they were the best stopping brakes in any car I had until my '77 LD Police Interceptor (though I think my current '69 Crown's brakes are better than the '62 / 3, too). I can think of a few reasons to switch to discs: Discs dry off faster after driving through water, so your braking power comes back a lot sooner. I found that my '62 went through brake shows at a ferocious pace; I had to replace them every 10 - 15,000 miles - I expect that the pads on the disc system would go longer than that. Replacement of pads is a lot easier than replacement of shoes, and a _lot_ of mechanics these days aren't very familiar with old drum systems like on an old Imperial. Switching to discs would likely be arduous, time - consuming, and expensive. I also find that discs tend to make your tires filthy very quickly. OTOH, people modify old cars in this way and other similar ways all the time, with good sucess - just because the car was well engineered originally doesn't mean that modifying it will neccesarily make it worse. -Kle '69 Crown 4DHT ----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com ----------------- This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm