Re: Fw: IML: 55 ignition problems Update
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Fw: IML: 55 ignition problems Update



I work @ NAU, and we have a manufacturing shop for various labs and unique equipment for all over campus, and they gave me the Teflon raw material, and I made if for the replacement of the original plastic part. I was able to remove the distributor, and shook out both parts of the plastic one, so I knew what to make, and it is perfect!
Good luck.


At 12:24 PM 9/13/2004, you wrote:
Rick;

Thanks for sharing and offering of rebuilding the part. The original part is
only partially there, so sending it to you would not be fruitful. However,
where did you get the Teflon? It sounds as if others with dual points may
run into the same thing eventually.

Roger D. Casagrande

----- Original Message -----
From: "Rick Wiselus" <rick.wiselus@xxxxxxx>
To: <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 11:29 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: IML: 55 ignition problems Update


> I had the same problem with my 53. I manufactured one out of a piece of > Teflon, it is better than the original one. The insulator into the base of > the distributor. > If you have the original plastic part and want to send it to me, I will > make you a replacement. > I later had to replace all the wire inside the distributor too. I will go > w/a petronix electronic ignition if I have any more problems with the dual > points. > > At 07:46 PM 9/12/2004, you wrote: > >My saga continues with more stories. One has to be careful and thorough. > >Additional problems were found including a bad coil to distributor wire, and > >the latest, a short in the distributor from the coil lead to case. The short > >is the result of a bad insulator which allowed the stud to contact the shell > >in the shell port. That part of the insulator was missing. So when the > >points and condensor were replaced and checked, there was no contact to the > >shell. I tightened that nut prior to installation into the engine. But I > >learned today that small movements of the coil wire stud could cause a short > >to the shell. So while I believed the checkout was correct, after > >installation in the engine, the short returned. The insulator has cracked > >while diagnosing the problem. I now have a plumbing washer and electrical > >tape around the stud until I can get a more suitable replacement. It > >probably won't last long with the high engine temperatures generated. > > > >Does anyone have a source for this insulator in the distributor for the coil > >primary wire? > > > >Roger D. Casagrande > >55 Newport > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Roger Casagrande" <rdc2382@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >To: <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 4:14 PM > >Subject: Re: IML: 55 ignition problems > > > > > > > Thanks to all who responded. > > > > > > I am not home free yet, but the ignition switch was a problem. I sprayed > >the > > > Radio Shack contact cleaner into it and it is functioning well again. I am > > > not sure putting the plug to the manifold really is providing a decent > > > ground to check the spark. I've got to make sure the timing position is > > > approximate to what it was after replacing the distributor and using fuel > > > poured into the engine to compensate for the car sitting for awhile. I > >have > > > not gotten around to that yet bur will this weekend. An update will be > > > provided. > > > > > > Thanks again. > > > > > > Roger D. Casagrande > > > 55 Newport > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: <RandalPark@xxxxxxx> > > > To: <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2004 8:24 PM > > > Subject: Re: IML: 55 ignition problems > > > > > > > > > > If you are really careful, you can bypass the dash and hot wire the car. > > > If it runs that way, then you know that there is something wrong in the > > > ignition switch or in the wiring under the dash. > > > > > > > > I had two '55 Imperials for a while. They both came from the same place. > > > The one I kept has always been dependable since I was able to get it > > > running. The other one had something wrong in the ignition switch. It > >would > > > only start if it was hot wired, but would stay running without the hot > >wire > > > after it started. I was pretty sure that the ignition switch was at fault, > > > but gave the car away before I got around to fixing it. The guy that I > >gave > > > it to tracked down the problem and it was the ignition switch, so they > >can, > > > and do give trouble. > > > > > > > > Paul > > > > > > > > In a message dated 9/7/2004 6:48:59 PM Eastern Daylight Time, "Roger > > > Casagrande" <rdc2382@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > > > > > >My 55 Imperial has lost its "spark". The car has run from November 2003 > > > when I got to about a month ago. I checked the spark by removing the #1 > >plug > > > and with the wire attached put the plug base to the intake manifold and > >had > > > someone turn over the engine. No spark was seen at the plug. I checked the > > > coil by putting a plug with a 0.175" gap between the coil output and the > > > manifold and got a solid blue spark. I changed the points and condenser > >and > > > checked that the primary wire was not grounded when both points were open. > > > > > > > > > >Another note is that I have the center portion of the dash off to > >repair > > > the radio and polish the knobs of the controls. I don't know if something > >in > > > the ignition requires all of the dash controls and radio to be connected. > > > > > > > > > >I need some suggestions for further trouble shooting. > > > > > > > > > >Roger D. Casagrande > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com ----------------- > > > > This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please > > > > reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be > > > > shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the > > > > Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com ----------------- > >This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please > >reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be > >shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the > >Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm > > > > > ----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com ----------------- > This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please > reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be > shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the > Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm >



-----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm




----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm




Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.