Your credit is good with the house. --- List Server <mailing-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This is the digest version of the Imperial Mailing > List. To receive messages individually, send an > email to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with the > following in the body of your message: > > set mode standard mailing-list > > To unsubscribe entirely, visit: > http://imperialclub.com/IML-Specific/unsubscribe.htm > > If you have been switched to digest mode without > your consent and you want to know why, visit: > http://imperialclub.com/IML-Specific/autodigest.htm > > > | > | > | > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > ~~~~IML DIGEST~~~~~~~~~~~~~~MESSAGE > SEPARATOR~~~~~~~~~~~~ > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > | > | > | > > Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 20:00:27 -0500 > From: Brad Hogg <roadhogg@xxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: IML: AutoTemp I (1968) > Reply-To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > I was shocked to learn that not everyone knows about > this feature. A friend > and I got into my 78 the other day and the ATC > wasn't running. Suddenly the > system started up and he wondered what had happened. > I guess he doesn't > drive his Imperial much because he didn't know about > that feature. I love > it, especially on a cold day. The system is polite > enough to wait until it > has some heat in the heater before it starts blowing > air on you! > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "David Duricy" <desotobravo@xxxxxxxxx> > To: <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 7:12 PM > Subject: Re: IML: AutoTemp I (1968) > > > Thanks for the reply, Brad. > > The cold engine lock-out is working on the '68. > After > the engine warmed, the system came on with the > "Hi-Auto" button already pressed in waiting. > > Dave > > | > | > | > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > ~~~~IML DIGEST~~~~~~~~~~~~~~MESSAGE > SEPARATOR~~~~~~~~~~~~ > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > | > | > | > > Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 18:23:25 -0700 (PDT) > From: David Duricy <desotobravo@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: IML: AutoTemp I (1968) > Reply-To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > The strange behavior still remains, of course. "Off" > trips the ciruit breaker. "Auto" shuts the system. > "Hi-Auto", "Def" and "Hi-Def" seem to work, and I > can't hear the servo motor. > > Another thing I have been wondering about is the > selector switch. The '68 A/C switch looks the same > as > the switches I've used for 1971 through 1973 > AutoTemp > and non-AutoTemp cars. In fact, I used a '71 through > '73 switch to replace the broken original on the > '68. > > I sure hope that they interchange. > > Both switches have the number 58024 stamped on the > back. However, the '68 switch has 2820643 and 2237 > printed in red on it, while the '72 switch has > 34310193 and 2092 printed in red on it. > > Even if they're different, that wouldn't explain the > sudden silence of the servo. > > Dave > > --- Brad Hogg <roadhogg@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > I was shocked to learn that not everyone knows > about > > this feature. A friend > > and I got into my 78 the other day and the ATC > > wasn't running. Suddenly the > > system started up and he wondered what had > happened. > > I guess he doesn't > > drive his Imperial much because he didn't know > about > > that feature. I love > > it, especially on a cold day. The system is > polite > > enough to wait until it > > has some heat in the heater before it starts > blowing > > air on you! > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "David Duricy" <desotobravo@xxxxxxxxx> > > To: <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 7:12 PM > > Subject: Re: IML: AutoTemp I (1968) > > > > > > Thanks for the reply, Brad. > > > > The cold engine lock-out is working on the '68. > > After > > the engine warmed, the system came on with the > > "Hi-Auto" button already pressed in waiting. > > > > Dave > > > > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard. > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail > | > | > | > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > ~~~~IML DIGEST~~~~~~~~~~~~~~MESSAGE > SEPARATOR~~~~~~~~~~~~ > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > | > | > | > > From: "Matt Hopkins" <mhoppy@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: IML: Austin TX Trip > Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 21:53:48 -0500 > Reply-To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > We are coming to TX finally, next week. I asked some > time ago about > Imperials in the area and of course I can't find > that info anymore. > > So, email privately if you would. I am particularly > interested in riding in > a 67 or 68 while I am there. I believe my wife' > brother moved to the suburb > of Leander(sp). We'll find out Wed. > > Matt Hopkins > 66 Crown > 75 Lebaron > 92 Imperial > > | > | > | > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > ~~~~IML DIGEST~~~~~~~~~~~~~~MESSAGE > SEPARATOR~~~~~~~~~~~~ > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > | > | > | > > From: "jsadowski" <jsadowski@xxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: IML: AutoTemp I (1968) > Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 19:50:53 -0700 > Reply-To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > ------=_NextPart_000_0023_01C45FA4.B7A11900 > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="iso-8859-1" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > I know that the 69 system is fused & not on a > breaker, so something else = > is going on here. Sometime in 73 when I had my first > 69, the resistor = > burned out & the shop wired the system so it would > work === message truncated === __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail