There is a gap in my understanding that makes me puzzled every time a certain answer is given. A member has a 1959 with a failed brake booster. The type resembles a rubber concertina, connected directly to the brake pedal. The way it should work is as follows. Once the engine is turned on, vacuum is created in a largish tank on the interior side wall of the car, adjacent to, but separate from, the actual brake booster, When the brakes are applied, a valve opens in the booster itself and the air within the rubber concertina is rapidly pulled out by the tank, which is held at vacuum by the engine just for this purpose. When the brakes are released, the valve is closed and vacuum is discontinued within the bellows unit, allowing it to return to its former position, full of air. I hope this is an effective, if somewhat crude, way of explaining its operation. So, I am puzzled when it is stated that a leak or breach in the bellows unit is given as a reason for an engine to run rough at idle. This runs counter to my experience. When I has a similar breach in mine, it had no effect on the engine unless I pressed the brake pedal. I surmise, apparently incorrectly, that with the valve in the booster unit closed, vacuum in the separate tank is just fine, and the breach in the bellows unit is not affecting the engine because it is not in use, or not part of the system, until the pedal is pressed in and the valve is opened. At that point, obviously, the leak is pretty bad and all vacuum is lost. Prior to this action, however, surely there is no vacuum in the bellows unit anyway, so a breach in the unit cannot affect the engine. I am always thrown by folks saying their booster unit leak is affecting engine performance. I cannot see how this can be and look forward to learning how what seems to me to be improbable is actually taking place. Also, I wonder why the breach that I have had in my bellows unit never affected the engine until I pressed the brake pedal. Hugh > 58 Imperial, with a newly replaced bellows unit >