Imperial ownership/ was 440 vs 413!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Imperial ownership/ was 440 vs 413!



That is an idea I like . In fact,  I have been telling my long suffering
wife that being an IML member  requires ownership of multiple Imperials. Or
well, it should!.


-----Original Message-----
From: Dick Benjamin <DickB@xxxxxxxxx>
To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, July 12, 2002 11:16 PM
Subject: Re: IML: Off line response, was: 413 vs 440!


What you need to do is to buy one of each type of Imperial, then you can
decide for yourself.

Dick Benjamin
----- Original Message -----
From: clay-deb <clay-deb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 7:47 PM
Subject: Re: IML: Off line response, was: 413 vs 440!


> Well darn,   I have been  following this thread with interest and waiting
> for the 440 owners  to rise up and put this 413 nonsense to rest, .
>                    I guess its not going to happen.  Should I be checking
in
> to a 413 swap for my 67 ?  ;)
>                                          Clay Smith  67 Crown Coupe





Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.