-------------- Original message --------------
From: Bob Schmitt <bsbrbank@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Dick -
>
> Thanks for the detailed explanation and potential warning. I think
> the taillight bulbs have good spacing from the lense on my '66, but
> will check this before any install.
>
> Using these new bulbs on my other old car ('69 Alfa, if they fit) may
> be more important, as two drivers behind me have told they didn't
> see my brake lights. But they always check out OK, so something is "too dim".
>
> Bob
>
> At 05:36 PM 2/18/2008, you wrote:
> >Note that the P3496 is a conventional wire filament bulb, however, not an
> >LED. It is filled with Krypton gas, which produces a brighter light, so it
> >won't have the instant illumination feature of the LED type bulbs as us ed in
> >some new cars and most big trucks and emergency equipment built in the last
> >few years.
> >
> >The P3496 uses the same amount of current as the 1157 on the brake and turn
> >filament (27 watts each), but almost 3 times the current on the tail light
> >filament, which could cause a heating problem in cars with plastic lenses,
> >especially where the lenses are close to the bulb, because the tail lights
> >are on continuously at night, the brake/turn filaments are only on for a
> >short time. The P3496 tail light filaments produce 8 watts of heat, the
> >original bulbs (1157s) produced only 3 watts each.
> >
> >Dick Benjamin
>
>
> ----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com -----------------
> This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please
> reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response wi ll be
> shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
> Administrators should be sent to iml.webmonster@xxxxxxxxx
> To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
>