Re: IML: 1952 vs 1953
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IML: 1952 vs 1953
- From: Kenyon Wills <imperialist1960@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 21:04:57 -0700 (PDT)
I don't know those cars inside out, but I favor the
lines on the 53/54 - especially the rear door and rear
window. I'd chase the later ones harder myself.
Passed on a really hammered 50 awhile back. Just to
frumpy even at $500 (sorry 1950 folks).
Pre 55 stuff seems to be warming up after being in the
doldrums forever.
-Kenyon
--- Timothy Hulse <t.hulse@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hey everyone,
> I was on ebay and seen the 52 Imperial and the 53
> Imperial. Why is the 53 so much and the 52 with
> 10,000 original miles, original everything not
> bidding as well. There are no hits on the 52. Is it
> because everyone is bidding on the 53 and when they
> dont get it they will go to the 52?
>
> Thanks
> Tim
> Bakersfield Ca
> 1956 2-door Southampton
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Building a website is a piece of cake. Yahoo! Small Business gives you all the tools to get online.
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/webhosting
----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to iml.webmonster@xxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network