Re: IML: wiring harness
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IML: wiring harness
- From: "Bob Merritt" <bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 07:34:34 -0400
You would be amazed at the number of changes in the wiring harness from 64
to 65 and from 65 to 66. I supplied patterns to Greg Leggatt who builds new
wiring harnesses (email:
leggatt@xxxxxxx ) .
As Greg and I went through the original harnesses from 64, 65 and 66, it
made no sense why Chrysler made some of the changes.......for instance, in
64 the connections to the front turn signal lights use a female connection,
but in 65 they changed to a male connection.........
Then you add the complication of a different wiring harness for cars with AC
or with AC and AutoPilot or with 4 way flasher. I didn't even mention the
signal sentry system (not used in 64). It can be a nightmare.
Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: "dansgarage@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <dansgarage@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 6:36 PM
Subject: Re: IML: wiring harness
Hi All...question for the '1964-66' guru's.......I know that the 64-65
Imperials used the 413 motor which changed to the 440 in '66....wold a
engine compartment wiring harness for either one of these yeras (64,65,66)
also fit the other years? ..or is the wirng for the 440 completely
different for the '66???
Thanks all!
Dan Melnik
----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to iml.webmonster@xxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network