We had a club member that put headers on his 62 against
others advice. He found that he had overheating problems on long
trips.
John
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 11:55
AM
Subject: Re: IML: Headers for
Imperials
Headers a neat on a race car, but on an Imp. I just don't see the use.We
had Many cars that ran in the 12- 14 second times that had stock cast iron
manifolds, with few mods, but with 4800-5000 lb cars the most important thing
is torque.Since that is developed at lower RPMs, the headers are of little
use.With less exhaust restriction, low speed driveability can suffer, I
learned that long ago, I installed the entire exhaust system from a 71 340
Duster, on my 65 273 Formula S Barracuda, it killed the motor under 3000 RPM,
the original exhaust was a 21/4" single. It sounded good, but it didn't run
better.I would have to say the Engineers, did their home work, and that few
changes we make, are better.Just a thought, Dave.
--------------
Original message -------------- From: Kenyon Wills
<imperialist1960@xxxxxxxxx>
> Premade headers specified for
any application besides > Imperial will likely not work. The steering
box is in > a completely different place than it is on other Mopar
> cars due to the longer nose, and this leads to >
"complications". > > Not to say that Schumacher hasn't solved
the problem > (you'd have to ask them), but it's not likely based on
> the time I spent researching options, since there are > not
enough people putting headers on our cars to > justify an investment
by a vendor. - meaning that > custom would be your path if you're
going to go that > way. > > > While not as cool
looking as headers, the HP C-body > exhaust manifolds were the only
option that I was able > to find, and I'm very happy with them - they
are a > bolt-in solution without the exposure to cracking and
> engine compartment heat that you get from headers, > custom
made or otherwise. > > item 320091994029 on ebay is an
example. > > -K > > > --- "Henry Blair
Jr." wrote: > > > You may want to
look at Schumacher Creative Services > > headers before >
> you have them custom made. These headers are both > >
efficient and > > compact. > > > > Henry
> > > > On 3/18/07, James L BURTON
> > wrote: > > > > > >
Well, I had the original engine rebuilt, I thought > > that it was
also a 413 > > > but looking closer I was convinced that it is
> > 383. The original starter > > > takes up so mu ch
space . And it makes this engine > > deprived of the > >
> horsepower it should easily obtain, for the custom > >
headers I'm going to have > > > made for it. The has an extreme
make over and it > > needs the Hi output smaller > >
> starter. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > >
> From: Bill Watson > > > To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2007 4:12 AM > > >
Subject: Re: IML: High output Starter For 60imp > > 383 >
> > > > > > > > Also, starters for 1962 and
up V8 engines will not > > fit pre-1962 engines. > >
> Before 1962 Chrysler used Autolite direct-drive > > starters.
Starting in 1962, > > > Chrysler-built reduction gear starters
were used. > > The problem lies in the > > > ring
gear - the number o f teeth on the gear was > > changed along with
the > > > starter. > > > > > >
1962-64 Dodge 880 and Chryslers with manual > > transmissions
continued to use > > > direct-drive stafters as did
Canadian-built > > 1962-66 slant six models > > >
(Prestolite starter). > > > > > > > >
> Bill > > > Vancouver, BC > > > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > >
From: JIM LORENZEN > > > To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2007 12:07 AM > > >
Subject: Re: IML: High output Starter For 60imp > > 383 >
> > > > > > > > Hi Jim - > > >
Are you sure about the 383? As far as I know, > > unless your
Imperial has had > > > a heart transplant, it should have a
413. > > > Just curious - > > > Jim L. in OR
> > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From:
James L BURTON > > > To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> > Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2007 12:43 AM > > > Subject:
IML: High output Starter For 60imp 383 > > > > > >
> > > Hi,everybody, Im trying to locate a high output >
> starter for a strong 383 > > > .Sure could use some help.
A model number would be > > nice also. Its for a 60 > >
> imperial. Thank you Jim > > > > > > >
> > > > > ----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com
> > ----------------- > > > This message was sent to
you by the Imperial > > Mailing List. Please > > >
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your > > response will
be > ; > > shared with everyone. Private messages (and >
> attachments) for the > > > Administrators should be sent
to > > webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > To
UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to > > >
http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm > > > > >
> > > > > > > -- > > Henry K.
Blair, Jr. > > 4365 Butternut Way > > Roswell, GA
30075-5225 > > (678) 248-4903, (770) 998-4897, Cell (770) 827-7392
> > henryblairjr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >
henryblairjr@xxxxxxxxx > > > > > >
----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com > >
----------------- > > This message was sent to you by the Imperial
Mailing > > List. Please > > reply to
mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your > > response will be
> > shared with everyone. Private messages (and > > a
ttachments) for the > > Administrators should be sent to >
> webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to
> > http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm > > >
> > > > > >
________________________________________________________________________________
> ____ > Never miss an email again! > Yahoo! Toolbar
alerts you the instant new Mail arrives. >
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/ > >
> ----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com -----------------
> This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please
> reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be
> shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
> Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
> BLOCKQUOTE>
|