Re: IML: rear end parts replaced

["Gary Allen" <gabhjb@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi  I have a 1967 imperial service manual it states that they changed the rearend in 67 and it is setup like ford 9 in. check the pinon nut first to see if it is torqued , then check up and down play  for pinion bearing preload.if
 the pinon bearing is bad the seal should be leaking.

On 1/26/07, Frederick Joslin <fljoslin@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

Chris:

 

It appears that the ring and pinion were not replaced so any wear on these parts from before the re-build would have carried over.

 
 

----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Strohmeyer"
To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: IML: rear end parts replaced

Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 20:13:01 -0800


Note to Admin: This is my last question on my rear end!

Thx Sherman,

Ok. It's been 10k miles since the rebuild(and 10 years ago). Here's what
they replaced:
ONE HM89443 Bearing
ONE. 7216 Seal
TWO. 25590 Bearing
TWO 25520 Bearing
ONE. HM803149 Bearing
ONE. HM89410 Bearing
ONE HM803110 Bearing
TWO shims and a couple oil seals and ONE 4318060 Oil additive to the GL5
gear oil.
Is there a break-in period after the rebuild therefore the oil should be
changed right afterwards?
I will try changing the oil with a heavier one
AND the limited slip additive and let you know
if the noise goes away.

Chris
67 Imperial Convertible




----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial
Mailing List. Please reply to
mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response
will be shared with everyone. Private messages
(and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm

 

Fred Joslin