Paul W. -----Original Message----- From: fljoslin@xxxxxxxx To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 8:54 AM Subject: Re: IML: Question about harmonic damper Rob:In the theme of originality, I am pretty sure that you can get you original damper rebuilt to better than original specs.
For Imperial applications, you do not need a race damper. Check these guys out: http://www.damperdoctor.com/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=CTGY&Store_Code =DD&Category_Code=CHRI have never used them, but they may be worth contacting. They seem to have many dampers.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Rob van der Es" To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: IML: Question about harmonic damper Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 15:52:56 +0100 (CET) Hi, In addition to my earlier message of yesterday with regard to my request for information I would like to add this link: www.440source.com/dampers.htm The first damper on this page is a stock damper (allthough it is SFI approved..) and the second one is a fluid damper (just like Fluidampr is selling for almost three times as much). So I think I will choose one of those two. Can anyone explain to me (Dick B. or Paul W. maybe ?) what the benefits are of a fluid damper. I have been told that a fluid damper is working better at a broader rpmrange than a standard elastomer (rubber) damper. Is this true, and will it
do my engine and bearings good because they suffer less from harmonics? Thanks in advance for your help, Robert van der Es 1960 Imperial Crown Hardtop Op Ma, 8 januari, 2007 4:47 pm, schreef Rob van der Es:
Hello gang!, First of all I would like to wish y'all a Happy New Year. To start my new Imperial year the right way, I am preparing my 1960Imperial for the coming riding season (that will be the end of April
then,
considering the climate overhere). One of the things I would like to replace is the harmonic damper(sometimes called a balancer but that ain't the right word for it,
since
the cranckshaft of our 413's is internally balanced). I think the
outer
ring of mine has slipped over the years, resulting in an incorrect
timing
mark. I also think that since the ring was able to slip the rubber
between
the inner and outer ring is malfunctioning.So I am looking for a new one. Now my question: should I go for a
normal
replacement damper (with rubber elastomer inside) or should I go for a
high tech fluid damper?? I have been told that fluid dampers are much better
for a long engine life (read crankshaft and bearing life) since they
are able to absorp harmonics over a wider rpm range.
Any thoughts? Thanks, Robert ----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com ----------------- This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Pleasereply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be
shared
with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators
should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com ----------------- This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm Fred Joslin ________________________________________________________________________Check out the new AOL. Most comprehensive set of free safety and security tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from across the web, free AOL Mail and more.
----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com ----------------- This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm