Re: IML: How much Marvel?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IML: How much Marvel?
- From: <dansgarage@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 22:36:12 -0700
Hi All...regarding the adding of Marvel oil as a lubricant for the motor....does this ONLY apply if the motor has sat for a long time?..what, if anything, would it provide for a recently rebuilt motor (menaing with less than 50,000 miles since the rebuild)...also, just HOW MUCH Marvel does one add when adding to a motor or as a gas additive?
Thanks all!!!
Dan Melnik
---- ajl <alacaria@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
=============
Marvel is the best for oil and gas it gas been around for years and unlike
all the other new additives that come out, you will not see it in a few
years in the clearance bin.
At 09:15 AM 6/27/2006 -0400, you wrote:
>My intuitive brain can't address the accuracy of the numbers here, but I
>have done the same thing with success. In particular, after getting my '55
>Imperial running after its long sleep (1965 through 1997) I used this
>product as an additive in the gas and oil over an extended period and
>noticed a big improvment in oil/gas consumption, as well as smoothness and
>power.
>
>I have also used minimal amounts of ATF (Dextron) in both gas and oil, at
>the suggestion of a stock car racer pal, and believed that it helped quiet
>down noisy (but not very loud to begin with) lifters. It is an excellent
>lubricant and also acts as a detergent to dislodge "engine crud" from the
>inside of the crank case. It is safer and more gradual than so called
>"engine cleaners". If an engine is believed to have an internal build up
>problem, the best way to deal with it is to remove the oil pan and
>actually clean it out, rather than rely on a can of anything.
>
>Paul W.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: paul knisely <thestocksguy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Sent: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 23:41:26 -0700
>Subject: IML: Additives
>
>My machinist uses Marvel Mystery oil for a gas mix, and I had the pleasure
>of seeing the strip-down, and I bore miked the six holes - all had 3.5-4.5
>bore wear - deep, shallow, 90 degree - and then he told me it was almost
>twelve years since he rebuilt it and had covered 133,000 miles. I asked
>him why the pistons weren't pounded out (the way he drives !), and the
>rings still retained their .02" end gaps. He popped the trunk where the
>engine periphery was, and pulled out a can of MARVEL, told me the periodic
>maintainance it had satisfied, because we do not have an upper cylinder
>lubricant anymore.
> Paul T.
> Knisely (Seattle)
>From: randalpark@xxxxxxx
>Reply-To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: IML: Additives
>Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 01:47:18 -0400
>
>When I was driving my Imperials as everyday cars through the middle 1980's
>I used an additive called Instead of Lead by Bardhal. Since then, I don't
>use anything but Premium Unleaded fuel. The cars are driven occassionally
>on combined city/country 40 trips mixing speeds of 50 through 75mph. I
>haven't seen any ill effects. If I was running them frequently on long
>distance, high speed trips, I would probably use an additive. I have heard
>that valve wear will occur after about 70,000 miles. At that point I am
>thinking it wouldn't hurt to do a valve job anyway, and while I'm at it,
>do it right with hardened valves and valve seats.
>
>Paul W.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: YBSHORE@xxxxxxx
>To: mailing-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Cc: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Sent: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 21:37:03 EDT
>Subject: IML: Additives
>
>Peoples,
>
> Is it best to run a lead additive and 93 octane or is there a better
> combo.
>
>Jack
>
>1956 Imperial Sedan w/354 and three speed Torqueflight
>----------
><http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100122638x1081283466x1074645346/aol?redir=http://www.aol.com>Check
>out AOL.com today. Breaking news, video search, pictures, email and IM.
>All on demand. Always Free.
>
>----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com ----------------- This
>message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please reply to
>mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be shared with
>everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the Administrators should
>be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to
>http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
>
>----------
><http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100122638x1081283466x1074645346/aol?redir=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Eaol%2Ecom>Check
>out AOL.com today. Breaking news, video search, pictures, email and IM.
>All on demand. Always Free.
----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network