Re: IML: Two questions about the 413 engine of a 1960 Imperial
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IML: Two questions about the 413 engine of a 1960 Imperial



I should have added that another exception to the factory recommended settings could be major modifications to the original ignition system. From the sound of it, the mechanic who installed this, and the after market carb, made some changes deliberately to optimize the running of the engine. If the car runs well, it should probably be left alone.
 
Paul W.
 
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Rob van der Es <r.vdes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 15:21:28 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: IML: Two questions about the 413 engine of a 1960 Imperial

Thanks Paul for your early reply :)

Yes, I too think that it would be wise to change the oil after a year.
I think I will go to the singlegrade SAE30 then, just to see if the engine
will stop using a little oil.
I just read in the FSM that it is safe to use SAE30 with temperatures as
low as 32 degrees! Well, at those temperatures I won't drive my Imperial
anyway :)

I will try SAE30 then just to see how the oilpressure is with a hot
engine, right now is is a little noisier with a hot engine then it is with
a cold engine but that might be the fact that workshop had poured in a
thin 10W40 multigrade.
I will just see what gives the best result  then.

With regard to the ignition settings, well.. if  I adjust it to spec
(10BTDC) the engine starts idling lumpy. A little tweaking with the two
idle mixture screws on the car bring improvement but it doesn't run as
smooth as with the previous setting of 16 BTDC!
Btw, the car came with a brandnew Edelbrock carburetor and a Petronix
electronic ignition!

So the person who installed the Petronix was happy with that kind of
pre-ignition I guess.
The engine starts very easy, when it is cold it always starts within
seconds and with a hot engine (after a long run for e.g.) it only takes a
little longer.
The engine stays cool and is in its normal temperature area on the dial
and so is the oilpressure.
I don't think the timingchain has worn very much cause I don't hear any
rattling :)
I never noticed any pinging (always use the best quality fuel, in my
country that is Shell V-power) so I think the vibration damper might have
slipped then.


To be sure, how does one notice that for sure and who do you correct it???

Thanks in advance (speaking about advance...),

Robert

Op Do, 15 juni, 2006 1:58 pm, schreef randalpark@xxxxxxx:
> The oil in your car should be changed even though it has only gone 500
> miles. With little use, the oil should still be changed at least once a
> year. A quality SAE 30 will work fine. 10w-40 is fine too. If the engine
> has decent oil pressure, and sounds good both cold and warm, don't worry
> about it. Keep it clean and full. If this car was being driven everyday
> and at highway speeds there might be a reason to fine tune the brand and
> type of engine oil. Modern multi-grade detergent oil will work fine in a
> 1960 Imperial.
>
>
> The timing should be set per the specifications in the FSM. The exception
> to this would be if under that setting the car doesn't run correctly. The
> most common problem would be spark knocking due to today's fuels. To
> correct this, timing would be retarded slightly. The other reason that
> the FSM timing spec might not be suitable is if the timing chain is worn
> or the vibration damper has slipped/been replaced causing the timing
> marks to become inaccurate. All of these scenarios result in the need for
> "road timing" the car. That means that you get it close, then drive the
> car and adjust the timing by trial and error. You need to be careful as
> incorrect timing can/will ruin the engine. Basically, if it runs good,
> doesn't spark knock, and cranks over easy cold and warm its pretty close.
> Based on what you stated in your note, the timing was probably fine right
> where it was. If you had noticed that it was difficult to crank the
> engine when it was at running temperatures, after a gas fill up for
> example, and/or noticed pinging, that would be sufficient reason to adjust
> the timing.
>
> Just because the car is 47 years old, don't assume that the engine has
> been overhauled. The engine could still run very well if it was not
> rebuilt, but had been taken care of properly by all of its owners. In the
> absence of service records, unless you take it apart, you may never know
> what has been done.
>
> I am sure that you will get a lot of very technical advice regarding both
> questions, and most of it will be very good. In 35 years and over
> 2,500,000 miles of driving, the above general information has served me
> well. The only enigines that I have owned that required overhauling were
> that way when I bought them. Otherwise, my cars have remained good
> runners by using suitable oils and gas, along with proper tune up and
> maintenance.
>
> Paul W.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rob van der Es <r.vdes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 12:28:35 +0200 (CEST)
> Subject: IML: Two questions about the 413 engine of a 1960 Imperial
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
> I would like to hear your expertise about two questions I have with
> regard to my 413 engine (1960 Imperial).
>
> Here is the story, I bought last summer in California a great 1960
> Imperial and after bringing it to Europe where I live (the Netherlands) I
> started to make the car ready for use on the road.
>
> I don't know the history of the car, I only know that it is a repo car.
> I bought it from a bank that had it for sale at an auction.
> As far as I can see and judge the engine must be a rebuild one, cause it
> is running powerful and smooth (can't imagine that I wouldn't have been
> overhauled in 46 years).
>
> I only have driven the car so far for a 500 miles or so and now it is
> ready and legally approved to use at a regular base (passed all the
> essential tests at the local DMV this monday!)
>
> Now we come to my first question: since I own this car almost a year now
> I
> think it is time to do an oil change allthough I only have driven 500 miles
> with the new oil that was poured in last summer in the US.
>
> What I would like to know is what kind of oil I should buy: a modern
> 10W40
> or a straight classic SAE 30 oil. From all the stories at the repair side
> of the club webpages I learned that a modern multigrade won't do any good
>  because of the very light base oil that is used (SAE10..). Thank you
> Dick
> for explaining that issue clearly as always!! But is it safe to use SAE 30
> singlegrade in a much colder environment then California??
>
>
> I would not drive the car at winters when it is freezing, but mainly on
> shiny days with temperatures between let's say 50 and 80 degrees outside
> temperatures. Would I be safe then or is 50 degrees to low to safely use
> SAE30?
> At the moment the engine is using a little oil, allthough I don't see any
> leaks or smoke at the tailpipes. I am almost sure the workshop that checked
> the car before delivery to me simply put a modern 10W40 in it so that
> might explain a lot..
>
> My next question is about how much pre-ignition is allowed on our beloved
>  413 engine?
> When I checked the timing last weekend prior to bring the car for its
> final check to the local DMV, I noticed that is has a massive 16 degrees
> BTDC timing!!
> The FSM says that the timing should be 10 degrees BTDC but when I readjust
>  the timing to that amount I experienced a severe powerloss :( For the
> book "How to repair big block Mopar engines" by Don Taylor I learned that
> it is safe to start with 12 degrees BTDC and then check if the engines
> "pings".. Well, I have heard no pinging with even 16 degrees
> BTDC and the engine is running very smooth then (a lot smoother at idle
> then with 10 degrees BTDC timing) and has lots and lots of power. Trotlle
> response is very impressive with that kind of pre-ignition set.
>
> But will I be safe with 16 degrees BTDC ?? If memory serves me well the
> same Don Taylor also mentioned that you should never go beyond the limit of
> +/- 4 degrees then the factory given 10 degrees of pre-ignition. That
> means that 14 degrees BTDC should be the limit for my engine?
>
> What is your advice on both subjects??
>
>
> Many thanks for your thoughts!
>
>
>
> Robert
>
>
>
>
> -----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
> This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please
> reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be shared
> with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the Administrators
> should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to
> http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
> ________________________________________________________________________
> Check out AOL.com today. Breaking news, video search, pictures, email and
> IM. All on demand. Always Free.
>
>




-----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please 
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be 
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm


Check out AOL.com today. Breaking news, video search, pictures, email and IM. All on demand. Always Free.


Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.