I've been though this six different ways regarding what I
will do on my 196o.
The current paint industry revolves around
2-stage paint. It's the most efficient and modern way to paint, and
asking people that are not restoring older cars, but fixing newer cars will
yeild all sorts of puzzlement about why you WOULDN'T use 2-stage. It's
your job to discern the difference, as there is precious little help out there
in the current paint arena.
Here's the reasons that I'm shooting
single stage on the practice cars that I'm doing in preparation to shooting my
196o:
Gloss/wet-look: That's the standard of
modern paint technology. People want modern cars to look as wet and
shiny as possible, especially the hot-rods and customs. Guess what most
people ask for at the paint counter? Guess what the paint guy is most
used to talking about? Guess what you'll hear about? Clear, gloss,
depth, shine, durability.... When you look at clear, you are seeing the
color reflected through an optical, clear lens of paint that looks very glossy
and "deep" as the light is refracted through the clear before it gets to your
eye.
They were spraying single stage at the factory, and your
car when new looked shiny and "hard", not deep and glossy. If there is
ANY portion of your car that has unrusted factory paint on it, take a buffer
to it and polish it. That's what you should be trying for if you want
period. Chrysler paint, especially from 64-74 seems to come back really
nicely when correctly polished with a buffer. It does not hold its shine
well without serious maintenance, which is why so many cars don't look their
best.
Over-restoration: I
met a guy with a positively brilliant 1967. The car was
yellowey/parchment or some such, and was very straight and original looking
with low miles and almost no wear, EXCEPT the car had been repainted.
He'd taken it to someone, and they had done a very competent job of smoothing
the flat sides, making it a really super paint job that I really admired at
first glance. I think that he said he spent around $5k.
Problem: The thing looked like it was
covered in clear syrup and was still wet.. To my eye, after having
polished my own cars with factory paint, the car just looked wrong. It
looked
too new and
too shiny. Like it was trying too
hard. The guy was VERY happy with it, so who am I to say, but....
The chrome wasn't redone, wasn't bad, but had a little "patina" to it, and the
paint was so busy being brilliant and crystalline diamond reflective and
mirror smooth, that it looked out of place on the car and sorta took
over. Would have looked super on a rod or custom, but looked really out
of place there. I don't want my car's paint to shout when I arrive
someplace. Just be shiny and nice.
I bought laquer, which
is correct for the car. I shot it and played with it on some of the
doors that are off the car, and was unable to get the results that I wanted
without polishing it quite a bit. The old-timers say that laquer will
return to the state that it was applied (dull if it dried that way), and I
tried using DuPont Nason single stage paint on my uncle's porsche and was much
happier with that.
It's a little shiny even so, but that's
OK. At least it isn't deep, and is close enough to the real thing (when
polished). Laquer is not as bullet-proof regarding bird-poop, tar, and
other things, so I'm OK moving to something more modern, although keep in mind
that until recently (15 years ago or so) that quite a few of the show-cars and
so forth were still painted in laquer. The paint industry and the EPA
have moved things away from the older stuff, but that does not make it any
less worthy of consideration when determining what to do in the restoration
process of an older car.
I predict/aspire to have paint that is similar
to Dick B's car (WOW! DICK, you rock!), and can't imagine ever having
clear on my car.
Suggest that if you are really still concerned
about this that you get a paint shop to spray a couple of pieces of metal in
single stage and 2-stage in the same color or similar and take them out in the
sunlight (!!) for comparison. Most paint stores can help with this as
well, but be careful about opinionated folks that don't do a good job of
comparing/advocating as opposed to
pushing.
-Kenyon
bom tie
<bomtie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I
am painting black. Does basecoat clear look right for a 50's-60's factory
job. Or will single stage give a deeper gloss that looks closer to factory
look?
_______________________________________________
Join
Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the
Web!
----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com
-----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing
List. Please
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response
will be
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for
the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To
UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to
http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network