Re: IML: classic car safety

["JB" <johnbab@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Wow     That Is Harsh. That car was being restored by the father and his 
father that owned a restoration shop ....He may have thought of it as a perk 
to drive that car as a show in Cranbrook called   "De Elegance" for the 
week-end. It is non the less a shame all the way around. John 67 Crown Conv
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "DR CHALLENGER" <drchallenger@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 3:33 PM
Subject: Re: IML: classic car safety


: then nobody including insurance should have to pay for injuries you 
receive
: when not wearing them.
:
: >From: "Buck Rind" <rind@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
: >>  I do not believe in the seat belt law. It should be left up to the
: >individual not mandated by the government. My 1962 Imperial did not come
: >equipped with belts and I won't put them in.
: >
: >
:
:
:
:
: -----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
: This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please
: reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be
: shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
: Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
: To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm
:
: 




-----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please 
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be 
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm