From: "Dick Benjamin" <dickb@xxxxxxxxx> Reply-To: mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To: "'Bob Merritt Simplex Mfg'" <bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> CC: <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: RE: IML: 56 Ballast Resistor Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 09:18:11 -0700
OOPS - Really!? I was sure that all the manufacturers woke up to that trick much earlier (Packard did in 1955). OK< I'll post this to the IML immediately, and thanks for catching my error, Bob.
-----Original Message----- From: Bob Merritt Simplex Mfg [mailto:bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 4:05 AM To: Dick Benjamin Subject: Re: IML: 56 Ballist Resistor
Hello Mr. B;
Not until 1960 was the ballast resistor bypassed for starting. That means, for 1956,7,8,9 a failed ballast resistor won't even allow the car to start.
Best regards, Bob Merritt
----- Original Message ----- From: "Dick Benjamin" <> To: <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 11:47 PM Subject: RE: IML: 56 Ballist Resistor
> You understand the circuit exactly correctly. The higher resistance will
> cause the coil to operate below the design primary voltage; however it is
> probably not going to show up in the car's performance except under
unusual
> circumstances.
>
>
>
> The ballast resistor is out of the circuit during start-up, so it won't
> affect the engine starting.
--- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
----------------- http://www.imperialclub.com ----------------- This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm