Re: IML: 1960 Imperial. Why was it a one year only design?

["jsadowski" <jsadowski@xxxxxxx>]

The doors & all glass was interchangeable through 62. The deck lid fits 
60-63. If you need rear quarters, these are also 60-63.
John
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Greg and Russell" <65luxuryliner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2005 8:03 PM
Subject: IML: 1960 Imperial. Why was it a one year only design?


With all the recent postings regarding the 1960 Imperial, I'd like to ask 
the List why was this striking car a one year only design?  If this has been 
discussed before, my apologies for asking.  I'm curious as to why Chrysler 
would have gone to the trouble and expense of tooling up for a car whose 
bodystyle would only last one year.  Was any of the sheetmetal 
interchangeable with the '59 or '61?

Greg McDonnell
'65 Crown convertible 




-----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please 
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be 
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm