Re: IML: 1990 Engine Computer

[Brad Hogg <roadhogg@xxxxxxx>]

I just learned that the computer from a 1990 Dynasty or New Yorker with the 3.3 Litre engine would have the same computer.

----- Original Message -----
From: Brad Hogg <roadhogg@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thursday, January 20, 2005 11:26 am
Subject: Re: 1990 Engine Computer

> I neglected to mention that the computer is located on the 
> driver's side of the car, just outboard of the battery.
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Brad Hogg <roadhogg@xxxxxxx>
> Date: Thursday, January 20, 2005 11:23 am
> Subject: 1990 Engine Computer
> 
> > I've always said that cars should NOT be computerized.  This is 
> a 
> > perfect example of why.
> > 
> > A couple of days ago, my 1990 Imperial stopped charging.  As 
> > usual, I thought is could be either the alternator or the 
> > regulator, or both.  I took the car to my mechanic, because he 
> has 
> > all the diagnostic tools, and he tells me that it is in fact 
> both 
> > that are toast.  Ok, no problem.  A voltage regulator is either 
> a 
> > small, cheap external component OR an integral part of the 
> > alternator.  Either way, I need an alternator so no big deal.  
> The 
> > problem is, Chrysler, in their infinite wisdom, integrated the 
> > voltage regulator INTO the engine computer!!!  How STUPID is 
> > that!!!  I liken that to putting the brake linings into the 
> > transmission so when they wear out, you need a new tranny!  
> > Needless to say, I am not on the hunt for an engine computer.
> > 
> > What I need is an engine computer that has the numbers 5266243 
> > stamped on it.  I don't know what years will carry this number 
> and 
> > if it is even on cars other than the Imperial.  The 3.3 or 3.8 
> 5th 
> > Avenue cars MIGHT have this computer but I can't be certain.
> > 
> > Is there anyone who has access to a suitable parts car?  I'd 
> like 
> > to find this computer as economically as possible.  I can't pay 
> > you money for going to a yard for me but I would do the same for 
> > you if the tables were turned.  I only say this to avoid a 
> > misunderstanding similar to one I recently experienced where a 
> man 
> > expected me to pay him $20 or $30 an hour to go to a yard for 
> > parts.  It's fine to want that but it wasn't made clear at the 
> > outset of the deal and that cost added to the parts made them 
> more 
> > expensive than new.  I just want to avoid this type of 
> > misunderstanding in the future.
> > 
> > Thanks in advance for your help.
> > 
> 



-----------------  http://www.imperialclub.com  -----------------
This message was sent to you by the Imperial Mailing List. Please 
reply to mailing-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and your response will be 
shared with everyone. Private messages (and attachments) for the
Administrators should be sent to webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To UN-SUBSCRIBE, go to http://imperialclub.com/unsubscribe.htm