The Forward Look Network | ||
| ||
1957-1959 Imperial 4-DR HT chassis question Jump to page : 1 Now viewing page 1 [50 messages per page] | View previous thread :: View next thread |
Forward Look NON-Technical Discussions -> 1955-1961 Forward Look MoPar General Discussion | Message format |
X-Frame |
| ||
Member Posts: 7 | This can be considered either a technical as well as historical question and hoping owners and/or historians will have the answer?
(1958 imperial x viewO8M1PNQQ 2.jpg) Attachments ---------------- 1958 imperial x viewO8M1PNQQ 2.jpg (367KB - 271 downloads) | ||
KcImperial |
| ||
Expert Posts: 2490 Location: Kansas City, KS | I believe this was only done on the 1957 and 1958 Imperial four door hardtops and not on the 1959. Although all three years are very similar visually, in fact they are all quite different when it comes to parts interchangeability. From what I understand, the four door hardtops received the "X" frame for extra rigidness due to the "B" pillar not connecting to the roof. In 1959, the "B" and "C" pillars were redesigned along with some of the inner bracing and inner door shells. This gave the extra rigidness that no longer required the "X" frame. Imperial was touted as "The most carefully built car in America". The added cost for the top of the line Imperial would be better justified than on a Chrysler, Plymouth or Dodge. | ||
60 Imp |
| ||
Location: North Australia | Nice pic above! I too have wondered about the X frame on the 57 and 58 Imperials. Thanks for the explanation KC. What about the 1956 year, did they get the X frame? Also, what are the fittings and tubes on the header pipes in the above pic? The 1960 model Imperial was billed as 'America's most carefully built car' (through to 63 from what I have learned on-line). This is likely because Imperial took over the Desoto plant (Warren Avenue, Dearborn), and the brand new high tech Imperial only assembly line, combined with the (claimed) industry first quality controls along the line. I find this stuff very interesting, and it is one of the reasons I went after a 60 Imp! Some good info in these links if anyone cares to look. https://www.google.com.au/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&c... https://www.google.com.au/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&c... Sorry to deviate this thread, but the engineering on the Imperial cars greatly interests me. Thanks for cranking it up X-Frame! I have one more question though. When did Chrysler stop building the Imperials in this plant? Steve. Edited by 60 Imp 2017-06-28 6:10 AM | ||
mikes2nd |
| ||
Expert 5K+ Posts: 5006 | almost looks like O2 sensors on the exhaust??? hah GM hiding it under a sheet... oh sneaky guys... sneaky... | ||
mstrug |
| ||
Expert 5K+ Posts: 6487 Location: Newark, Texas (Fort Worth) | They bought one with the fuel injection! http://www.forwardlook.net/forums/forums/thread-view.asp?tid=42214&... http://www.allpar.com/cars/desoto/electrojector.html Edited by mstrug 2017-06-28 7:38 AM | ||
X-Frame |
| ||
Member Posts: 7 | KCImperial... actually, the 1959 did this as well according to the 1959 collision parts book which shows the chassis frame alignment dimensions. Yes, that was the reason with many cars who did not use the X brace across the board with all of their models. It added reinforcement to the frame due to the lack of a roof but, the lack of a 'B' pillar just seems odd. It was the only make and model car in America that did this, which is one reason why I asked. All other Chrysler Corp models only used a X brace in the case of convertibles until they went unibody in 1960 (1967 for Imperial). That included hardtops. It just seems like a redundancy thing but one person hinted that it might have been the car's weight which contributed to it? 60 Imp... no, only convertibles in the Chrysler Corp stables used the X brace and did not even use it on the factory built limousines from 1955-1956. When Ghia took over building the limos for Imperial, they used 2-door coupes initially that had convertible frames under them to cut and lengthen so they have an altered X brace. I don't think that Stagecoach did this though? Edited by X-Frame 2017-06-28 8:47 AM | ||
firedome |
| ||
Expert Posts: 3153 Location: NY & VT | Interesting that GM bought one for examination... actually some other cars did feature this kind of frame, specifically Oldsmobile, which was always considered GM's division featuring advanced engineering, in much the way that Chrysler was. The '58 (and think '57) Oldsmobiles featured a frame that comprised BOTH a full perimeter frame AND full X in the center as well, not typical for other GM divisions to my knowledege, and this was true even for 4 door sedan models with B pillars and full frame doors! Hence the reason that my '58 Super 88 sedan is very rigid and tight to this day. Olds always went a little bit beyond the expected in my experience. Tried to post a pic of the frame from the '58 Olds fsm, but this bloody site won't permit over 500kB... time to get with the 21st Century program, mods!! Edited by firedome 2017-06-28 10:54 AM | ||
Powerflite |
| ||
Expert 5K+ Posts: 9604 Location: So. Cal | I think you just need better compression software. I can get over 1200 x 800 pixels at 250KB at very high quality. If you email me the picture, I can post it for you. | ||
KcImperial |
| ||
Expert Posts: 2490 Location: Kansas City, KS | X-Frame - 2017-06-28 7:37 AM KCImperial... actually, the 1959 did this as well according to the 1959 collision parts book which shows the chassis frame alignment dimensions. Here's a 1959 Crown Southampton for sale with undercarriage pics. There is no X-frame on 1959's. https://myclassicgarage.com/marketplace/cars/all/Chrysler-Imperial/1... I would not trust pictures in a parts book as it's easy for them to recycle from previous years if similar (close enough). I have the 3 volume set of factory shop manuals for 57-59 Imperials. They even includes a chapter on rebuilding the 6 cylinder engine. I hope that doesn't mean Imperial had 6 cylinders instead of Hemi engines. (59a.jpg) (59b.jpg) Attachments ---------------- 59a.jpg (86KB - 149 downloads) 59b.jpg (62KB - 178 downloads) | ||
hemidenis |
| ||
Expert Posts: 3887 Location: Northen Virginia | I agree with Don, manuals can be tricky sometimes, specially when the author never imagine in his wildest dream than 60 years later that some guys will be talking about it. Imperial are a mystery and they always will be. | ||
hemidenis |
| ||
Expert Posts: 3887 Location: Northen Virginia | this is the frame of my 57. (IMG_0038b.jpg) Attachments ---------------- IMG_0038b.jpg (53KB - 222 downloads) | ||
Greg P. |
| ||
Elite Veteran Posts: 769 Location: Oley, PA | Wow, that is a great photo! I love seeing original period photos like that. Very interesting that it is a GM proving ground photo, although I suppose it makes sense that any company would want to reverse engineer the competition. I had no idea that Imperial hardtops had an X-Frame. Fascinating! Two other things I'm curious about: 1. Sure does look like what would be O2 sensors installed on the exhaust, but I'm skeptical that is what they are. Does anyone know what they really are? Do any Imperial owners have such things on their cars? I don't even think the FI cars of the day had O2 sensors. My first guess would be that GM installed something to assist in their analysis of this car. There appears to be some discoloration on the pipes in that area, possible due to the welding. 2. There is a 360 degree loop on one of the transmission cooling lines. Is that common? Why would they do that? I don't recall ever seeing that. Edited by Greg P. 2017-06-28 9:08 PM (1958 imperial EDIT.jpg) Attachments ---------------- 1958 imperial EDIT.jpg (377KB - 105 downloads) | ||
X-Frame |
| ||
Member Posts: 7 | hemidenis - 2017-06-28 8:10 PM this is the frame of my 57. Nice frame photo but apparently not a 4-door hardtop but a pillared sedan or 2-door coupe version? | ||
hemidenis |
| ||
Expert Posts: 3887 Location: Northen Virginia | the loop in the lines is just a rudimentary radiator. | ||
X-Frame |
| ||
Member Posts: 7 | Greg P. - 2017-06-28 10:00 PM 1. Sure does look like what would be O2 sensors installed on the exhaust, but I'm skeptical that is what they are. Does anyone know what they really are? Do any Imperial owners have such things on their cars? I don't even think the FI cars of the day had O2 sensors. My first guess would be that GM installed something to assist in their analysis of this car. There appears to be some discoloration on the pipes in that area, possible due to the welding. 2. There is a 360 degree loop on one of the transmission cooling lines. Is that common? Why would they do that? I don't recall ever seeing that. I don't think any engine of that era had them but could be just added by GM for testing? | ||
christine-lover |
| ||
Expert Posts: 2996 Location: Sept. 1958 | GM bought cars from the other manufacturers, and I'm sure other manufacturers did the same. I have an original test report on a 58 Dodge with FI that GM bought for extensive testing with 3,617 miles. And, no oxygen sensors with 58 Mopars with EFI, not to mention Imperials didn't get FI. | ||
hemidenis |
| ||
Expert Posts: 3887 Location: Northen Virginia | this picture also contradicts the myth that the front suspension components and the leaf springs weren't painted... | ||
KcImperial |
| ||
Expert Posts: 2490 Location: Kansas City, KS | Greg P. - 2017-06-28 8:00 PM Two other things I'm curious about: 1. Sure does look like what would be O2 sensors installed on the exhaust, but I'm skeptical that is what they are. Does anyone know what they really are? Do any Imperial owners have such things on their cars? I don't even think the FI cars of the day had O2 sensors. My first guess would be that GM installed something to assist in their analysis of this car. There appears to be some discoloration on the pipes in that area, possible due to the welding. 2. There is a 360 degree loop on one of the transmission cooling lines. Is that common? Why would they do that? I don't recall ever seeing that. 1. Could very well be O2 sensors for some sort of testing equipment. Don't know anything about them other than that. No, not installed on any of my '58 Imperials. 2. Yes, all of my '58 Imperials have the full loop on the one cooler line. I guess the bean counters in accounting hadn't yet figured the $$ a U-loop would save. | ||
KcImperial |
| ||
Expert Posts: 2490 Location: Kansas City, KS | X-Frame - 2017-06-28 8:06 PM Nice frame photo but apparently not a 4-door hardtop but a pillared sedan or 2-door coupe version? Denis's Imperial is a pillared sedan but did you check out the photos on the link I provided? That one was a 1959 four door hardtop with no x-frame. | ||
mikes2nd |
| ||
Expert 5K+ Posts: 5006 | they supposedly used the loops to handle slack as motor mounts loosened with age during acceleration. Ive seen them on a variety of cars. The multi coil was actually a mini radiator. | ||
X-Frame |
| ||
Member Posts: 7 | hemidenis - 2017-06-28 11:49 PM this picture also contradicts the myth that the front suspension components and the leaf springs weren't painted... Obviously, they were painted. | ||
hemidenis |
| ||
Expert Posts: 3887 Location: Northen Virginia | Yes Don, I saw the link, and seems like the hardtop and the sedan shared the same body and frame as I painfully discovered last year.. | ||
X-Frame |
| ||
Member Posts: 7 | Even if the 1959 did not share the same configuration, at least we DO KNOW that the 1957 and 1958 4-Door Hardtops utilized the convertible X-brace frame while 4-Door Sedans and 2-Door Coupes did not. | ||
Jump to page : 1 Now viewing page 1 [50 messages per page] |
Search this forum Printer friendly version E-mail a link to this thread |
(Delete all cookies set by this site) | |