|
|
Expert
Posts: 1267
  
Location: San Antonio TX | Looks nice. Might have some rust in the rear quarters but I can't say for sure.
https://inlandempire.craigslist.org/cto/5982736171.html 
|
|
| |
|
Veteran
Posts: 256
Location: Chicago | Looks like it has 1962 fenders, or at least the trim. Also, in the two right side shots the paint on the quarter and sill is different than the fender and door. |
|
| |
|
Expert
Posts: 1497
Location: Fairfax, Minnesota | Photo quality is no where near adequate to sell this vehicle. I can't understand how a lens could be allowed to get this dirty. If it is clean, it cannot be called a lens. |
|
| |
|
Expert
Posts: 2519
 
Location: central Illinois | Pictures taken from a phone, probably cheek sweat all over the lens. Could be a cool car. |
|
| |
|
Expert
Posts: 1497
Location: Fairfax, Minnesota | R41HP - 2017-02-08 10:47 AM Looks like it has 1962 fenders, or at least the trim. Also, in the two right side shots the paint on the quarter and sill is different than the fender and door. Are the fender trim pieces the only difference between 61 and 62? Thanks |
|
| |
|
Expert
Posts: 1267
Location: San Antonio TX | Ray - 2017-02-08 4:29 PM R41HP - 2017-02-08 10:47 AM Looks like it has 1962 fenders, or at least the trim. Also, in the two right side shots the paint on the quarter and sill is different than the fender and door. Are the fender trim pieces the only difference between 61 and 62? Thanks
I didn't even notice that when I first found the ad. The headlight inserts also appear to be from a 62 as well; 61 had metallic inserts and 62 had black inserts. 62 New Yorkers also had a 300-esque cross grille, but this one seems to have the correct eggcrate grille.
|
|
| |
61 New Yorker 2D HT