57 Lancer pretty but poor job underneath would be fun car
horace
Posted 2016-10-17 1:23 PM (#523651)
Subject: 57 Lancer pretty but poor job underneath would be fun car



Extreme Veteran

Posts: 471
1001001001002525
Location: MN
https://minneapolis.craigslist.org/hnp/cto/5753980188.html

Edited by horace 2016-10-17 1:25 PM
Top of the page Bottom of the page
ABloch
Posted 2016-10-17 5:14 PM (#523671 - in reply to #523651)
Subject: Re: 57 Lancer pretty but poor job underneath would be fun car



Expert

Posts: 1479
1000100100100100252525
Location: Pacific Northwest
I take it from your thread posting that you know more about this car than the Craig's posting divulged. Do tell.........

I've got this on my "to call" list.

Edited by ABloch 2016-10-17 5:15 PM
Top of the page Bottom of the page
horace
Posted 2016-10-18 12:13 PM (#523729 - in reply to #523651)
Subject: Re: 57 Lancer pretty but poor job underneath would be fun car



Extreme Veteran

Posts: 471
1001001001002525
Location: MN
Well, we looked @ it looks pretty but there is lots of bondo & repair work done underneath presumably for rust. Interior looks nice but some incorrect things done there. Ran & drove great, of course new tires. Be a fun cruiser. GOLD pretty, pretty. Nice guys to visit with
Top of the page Bottom of the page
ABloch
Posted 2016-10-18 5:37 PM (#523751 - in reply to #523651)
Subject: Re: 57 Lancer pretty but poor job underneath would be fun car



Expert

Posts: 1479
1000100100100100252525
Location: Pacific Northwest
I assume that the Bondo and body work wasn't worth the asking price? Are the floors rusted through? Trunk looks like it was POR 15'd to inhibit any further rust. Recent paint and interior? I can't make out the errors in the interior, can you please educate me?

Thanks

I'll call the seller too.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
DEH
Posted 2016-10-19 1:14 PM (#523820 - in reply to #523751)
Subject: Re: 57 Lancer pretty but poor job underneath would be fun car



Veteran

Posts: 110
100
Location: Falcon, CO
As for the interior, it appears to have the Sport interior option based on the door panels having three horizontal strips of mylar. The colors of the door panels don't seem to match the rest of the interior, and the middle sections of the seats should have ribbed vinyl instead of smooth vinyl. That's what I could pick up from the two photos provided in the ad.

Don H.

Edited by DEH 2016-10-19 1:24 PM
Top of the page Bottom of the page
ABloch
Posted 2016-10-19 6:34 PM (#523846 - in reply to #523651)
Subject: Re: 57 Lancer pretty but poor job underneath would be fun car



Expert

Posts: 1479
1000100100100100252525
Location: Pacific Northwest
Cool. Thanks Don. Learned something new today. Unfortunately I had to lose something in the process.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
60 dart
Posted 2016-10-19 11:48 PM (#523858 - in reply to #523651)
Subject: Re: 57 Lancer pretty but poor job underneath would be fun car



Expert 5K+

Posts: 8947
50002000100050010010010010025
Location: WHEELING,WV.>>>HOME OF WWVA
for 21 , would one expect a show car -------------------------------------------------------later
Top of the page Bottom of the page
horace
Posted 2016-10-20 3:46 PM (#523919 - in reply to #523651)
Subject: Re: 57 Lancer pretty but poor job underneath would be fun car



Extreme Veteran

Posts: 471
1001001001002525
Location: MN
Painted a few years ago still great luster not showroom paint but good enough. Carpet wasn't in Coronets, I think the glove box color was wrong Wher is Neil when I really need Him RIP. The INSIDE of the wheel lips are poorly smeared bondo. Yes, he'll take a lot less but if it were a perfect car as sometimes we get to drool on here it wouldn't be 21 either!!
Top of the page Bottom of the page