They are the same. The 65 has no rooster comb inside, but the cable hookup is identical. Jimmy On 4/16/19, 62-65-mail-list-club@xxxxxxxxxxx <62-65-mail-list-club@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Not sure what attachment you refer to. The 1965 was the one year only > transmission that still used shift cables but the > cables in the car were connected to a shift lever instead of pushbuttons. > The cables at the transmission I thought were > the same. > > Thanks, > Gary H. > >> -------Original Message------- > >> >> No. I discovered that the attachment for 65 was different than 64 and >> earlier. I believe the photo you showed is 64. The 65 bolts in place >> if my memorysrrves my correctly. >> >> Bill >> >> On Mon, Apr 15, 2019, 3:47 PM < >> wrote: >> >> > Hi all, >> > >> > I know the 1962 - 1965 shift cable lengths are different. But are >> > the adjusting wheels and the pointed part of the cable the >> > same no matter what engine is in front of the cable? \6 - A - B - >> > RB >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Gary H. >> > >> > -- > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to 1962to1965mopars+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to 1962to1965mopars+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.