Re: 64 dodge b body k frame swap
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 64 dodge b body k frame swap



I have a 68 Charger k-frame in my 63. I think there is an adapter plate and I can take pics. I have a hemi with hooker super comp headers and they clear without issues

On Sep 24, 2013 1:43 PM, <stevec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Tony,
    I'm sure you will get opinions that go both ways on this, but I for one do not recommend using the later crossmember for exactly the reasons you site.
    
    While there may be some minimal gain in terms of weight distribution, it just doesn't seem like it would be worth the headache.  Things get tight at the firewall, and sliding the transmission back makes clearance tighter in the tunnel.  Kickdown linkage can be an issue, and you will have to lengthen the cooling lines.  Dropping the tailshaft by using a 4-speed type mount and crossmember helps with the tunnel clearance but also changes the driveline angles.

    I build transmission mounts for a living, and did some prototype mounts for this application.  There was no good mount-only solution, everything we tried still resulted in unsatisfactory results for the customer.  For this reason we do not offer a mount for this conversion and do not recommend it.

    Is there a particular reason you want to use the later k-member?

Steve Charette
    <arnsr@xxxxxxxxxxx> Sep 23 07:28PM -0500  

    ok if you use the 66-70 k frame in a 62-65 b body it moves the motor back so what do you do about the trans mount and headers being so close to the trans cross member
    tony

--
--
--
Please address private email -- email of interest to only one person -- directly to that person. That is, email your parts/car transactions and negotiations, as well as other personal messages, only to the intended recipient. Do not just press "reply" and send your email to everyone using the general '62-'65 Clubhouse public email address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine-tune the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
 
1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
http://groups.google.com/group/1962to1965mopars?hl=en.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to 1962to1965mopars+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
--
--
Please address private email -- email of interest to only one person -- directly to that person. That is, email your parts/car transactions and negotiations, as well as other personal messages, only to the intended recipient. Do not just press "reply" and send your email to everyone using the general '62-'65 Clubhouse public email address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine-tune the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
 
1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
http://groups.google.com/group/1962to1965mopars?hl=en.
 
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to 1962to1965mopars+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Home Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network


Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.

Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated.