I thought maybe they had a different ball joint in them, but after checking
my Hollanders the ball joint was even the same back into the late 50s, and it
does list the 62 and newer Bs as all the same
In a message dated 10/25/2012 12:43:54 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
62to65mopar@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:
I think yes. I can't see why 1962 and 1963 UCAs would be different than 1964 and 1965. -- -- Please address private email -- email of interest to only one person -- directly to that person. That is, email your parts/car transactions and negotiations, as well as other personal messages, only to the intended recipient. Do not just press "reply" and send your email to everyone using the general '62-'65 Clubhouse public email address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine-tune the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks! 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines: http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group. http://groups.google.com/group/1962to1965mopars?hl=en. |
Copyright © The Forward Look Network. All rights reserved.
Opinions expressed in posts reflect the views of
their respective authors.
This site contains affiliate links for which we may be
compensated.