|
Please reread,, I did not say dollars, I said gallons,,,,,,,big
difference,
In a message dated 10/15/2012 6:00:35 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
cj6cj8@xxxxxxxxx writes:
Dodger, I know for a fact that if I only had so many dollars to put fuel in
my tank to get somewhere, I sure as beck wouldn't be putting high octane in
there.
Just sayin'. (^;
On Oct 15, 2012 2:12 PM, "SL" <sliderr@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Advertising touting premium fuels drive me nuts for the exact
reasons already stated. Unless you need it, because of higher
compression (turbo/superchargers included) or you want to advance the
timing, it is a waste of money and your car may actually run worse.
Simply put the higher the octane, the harder the fuel is to ignite.
Now the additives in regular vs premium may differ and each brand of
fuel may be blended differently. The formulation also changes with the
seasons so it's a moving target.
Ethanol content will usually be lower in premium (91 octane here in
canada) and the best premium is generally considered to be Shell or Esso.
Ethanol will raise the octane rating of fuel but it has less energy
potential than gas and your MPG will often suffer. There is 94 octane
available here and it will often have a higher ethanol content to achieve
that rating so your results may differ.
Race gas is another topic, but will work better (as a general rule) on
an untouched original engine as it has more similar content to the fuel
available when our cars were new in addition to the higher octane)
--
--
--
Please address
private email -- email of interest to only one person -- directly to
th...
--
--
--
Please address private email -- email of interest
to only one person -- directly to that person. That is, email your parts/car
transactions and negotiations, as well as other personal messages, only to the
intended recipient. Do not just press "reply" and send your email to everyone
using the general '62-'65 Clubhouse public email address. This practice will
protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine-tune the
content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
1962 to 1965 Mopar
Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html
and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
http://groups.google.com/group/1962to1965mopars?hl=en.
--
--
--
Please address private email -- email of interest to only one person -- directly to that person. That is, email your parts/car transactions and negotiations, as well as other personal messages, only to the intended recipient. Do not just press "reply" and send your email to everyone using the general '62-'65 Clubhouse public email address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine-tune the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
http://groups.google.com/group/1962to1965mopars?hl=en.
|
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network