Re: Looking for info

[Roderek Soest <awesomemau5heads@xxxxxxxxx>]

225 cui/ 6. 0 miles it was just rebuilt and is sitting on a stand.

On May 15, 11:29 am, Jim Altemose <jaltemo...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Roderek,
>
> What ci is the engine and how many miles on it?
>
> - Jim
> Jim Altemose, Long Island, NY
> '63 Polara 500 (Max Wedge)
> '63 Polara 500 (383)
> '65 Belvedere I (Street Wedge)
> '71 Bronco
>
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Roderek Soest
>
>
>
> <awesomemau5he...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Why should I lower the compression? And if the engine blows, I will
> > just put a 273.
>
> > On May 15, 10:39 am, Scott Hinojos <lightspli...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Paint probably isn't going to keep detonation in check. ;) I'd still look
> >> into forged, low-compression pistons, and appropriate rings. I'd still keep
> >> the boost fairly low on an engine not specifically built for boost.
> >> On May 15, 2012 12:27 PM, "Roderek Soest" <awesomemau5he...@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> > Its been rebuilt and I haven't even put it in the car (I am going to
> >> > paint it first :p).
>
> >> > On May 15, 9:59 am, Scott Hinojos <lightspli...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > > The fuel injection is a good idea, because it simplifies fuel metering,
> >> > and
> >> > > makes said metering more reliable, which helps keep the engine alive.
> >> > > However, slapping a turbo on a stock, nearly 50 year old engine is not. I
> >> > > would at the very least replace the rings and bearings. While you're at
> >> > it,
> >> > > replace the pistons with forged parts, and drop the compression ratio.
>
> >> > > Or, you could skip all that, run very low boost (~5#) and hope things
> >> > hold
> >> > > together. The engine could live for a while, but I wouldn't put money on
> >> > > its long-term prospects.
>
> >> > > ~S~
> >> > > On May 15, 2012 10:54 AM, "Roderek Soest" <awesomemau5he...@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> > > wrote:
>
> >> > > > You all know that I have a 1965 plymouth barracuda. I want to install
> >> > > > single port sequential fuel injection, and turbo charge in attempt to
> >> > > > get better mileage and to give it more power. Has anyone done this
> >> > > > before with a stock engine? Also, does anyone know where I can get a
> >> > > > trans brake for a 904 tranny, that still can be driven normally? I
> >> > > > have looked everywhere for this, and the only ones i found you have to
> >> > > > select each gear manually to shift.
>
> >> > > > --
> >> > > > --
> >> > > > Please address private email -- email of interest to only one person --
> >> > > > directly to that person. That is, email your parts/car transactions and
> >> > > > negotiations, as well as other personal messages, only to the intended
> >> > > > recipient. Do not just press "reply" and send your email to everyone
> >> > using
> >> > > > the general '62-'65 Clubhouse public email address. This practice will
> >> > > > protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine-tune the
> >> > > > content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
>
> >> > > > 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> >> > > >http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.htmland
> >> > > >http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
> >> > > > --
> >> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >> > Groups
> >> > > > "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
> >> > > >http://groups.google.com/group/1962to1965mopars?hl=en.
>
> >> > --
> >> > --
> >> > Please address private email -- email of interest to only one person --
> >> > directly to that person. That is, email your parts/car transactions and
> >> > negotiations, as well as other personal messages, only to the intended
> >> > recipient. Do not just press "reply" and send your email to everyone using
> >> > the general '62-'65 Clubhouse public email address. This practice will
> >> > protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine-tune the
> >> > content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
>
> >> > 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> >> >http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.htmland
> >> >http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
> >> > --
> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> >> > "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
> >> >http://groups.google.com/group/1962to1965mopars?hl=en.
>
> > --
> > --
> > Please address private email -- email of interest to only one person -- directly to that person. That is, email your parts/car transactions and negotiations, as well as other personal messages, only to the intended recipient. Do not just press "reply" and send your email to everyone using the general '62-'65 Clubhouse public email address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine-tune the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
>
> > 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> >http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.htmlandhttp://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
> >http://groups.google.com/group/1962to1965mopars?hl=en.

-- 
--
Please address private email -- email of interest to only one person -- directly to that person. That is, email your parts/car transactions and negotiations, as well as other personal messages, only to the intended recipient. Do not just press "reply" and send your email to everyone using the general '62-'65 Clubhouse public email address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine-tune the content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!

1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
http://groups.google.com/group/1962to1965mopars?hl=en.