Re: I have an idea for a Slant Six/YES YES YES

[Roderek Soest <awesomemau5heads@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks for the replies. for it being unable to breathe, thats why you
get larger valves made, and bore out the ports.

On Apr 12, 6:33 pm, "Ollie" <satellite1...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Roderek'
> You are my best Buddy !!!! The /6 is a very beefable machine!!!!! You need
> 6,    1 barrel carbs, manifold, split headers....I love /6's...hang on
> Yes, Don is the Guru
> Ollie
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roderek Soest
> Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 10:53 AM
> To: The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse
> Subject: I have an idea for a Slant Six
>
> I am 17, so i have the speed bug. My 1965 plymouth barracuda has a
> slant 6 and i have an idea to make it a super powerful classic. Now,
> we all know stock, taht the slant 6's are tough. But, is it possible
> to beef it and run this configuration? My idea is to beef up the
> engine as much as I can to handle the speed and power and run it like
> this. It will have a standard single barrel, and 3- 4barrel carbs on
> the same intake that can feed all the pistons, and have 3 T4 turbos.
> each turbo is connected to a single 4 barrel and the middle turbo will
> be also connected to the single barrel (for fuel efficiency while not
> racing). Each waste gate will connected to an electronic controller (i
> will build  the electronics since i am studying to be an engineer) and
> It will have an electronic fuel pump for the 4 barrel's. while the
> single is connected to the mechanical fuel pump. While the engine is
> normal driving mode, the middle turbo will feed the single with a
> partially opened waste gate to control boost, and will close the other
> carbs. when I engage it into different level race modes( based upon
> expected power needed) it will allow the use of the other carbs and
> turbos based on the selected program. And possibly a NO2 as well for a
> real punch. I just want to know if I can make the engine handle the
> power, and not bog it out, or blow it up. i also would retro fir the
> driveline and chasis to handle the power. Another option would be to
> not use carbs, but fuel injection. So, what are your thoughts?
>
> --
> --
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --
> directly to that person. That is, send parts/car transactions and
> negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended
> recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect
> your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content
> signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!
>
> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.htmlandhttp://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.http://groups.google.com/group/1962to1965mopars?hl=en.

-- 
--
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person. That is, send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
http://groups.google.com/group/1962to1965mopars?hl=en.