Re: zddp

[Jacob Fox <imfast101@xxxxxxxxx>]

Cool deal thanks. I'm sure it'd still find all the little cracks in the gaskets even tho it's not fully synthetic.

This Lucas additive...what's it called exactly? And I've heard different stories about Lucas...some say it's junk and a scam...other swear by it. 

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 15, 2011, at 1:18 AM, Scott Hinojos <lightsplicer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Syntec is hyrdocracked (group III), actually, and NOT of a synthetic
> base stock. Hydrocracking is simply the highest level of refining
> mineral oil. It's very pure, but it's not really synthetic. That said,
> hydrocracked oil is still better than standard. Though, unless you can
> find a very good deal on the oil, you might as well buy a real
> synthetic, considering the relatively small price difference.
> 
> Several years ago, Mobil and Castrol (BP) fought it out against each
> other for the right to call hydrocracked oils "fully synthetic," which
> they are not. BP won, and now even Mobil has cheapened their product
> to include group III stock.
> 
> Read your labels: if it says "group III" on the back, not "API group
> IV" (PAO) or "API group V" (Ester), it's not a true synthetic, despite
> what the label claims.
> 
> -- 
> ~S~
> '64 Chrysler 300, AKA: "Leon", 383, 727, 8 3/4
> '62 Mercury Comet Custom wagon... a work-in-progress for too many years.
> 
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 11:23 PM, Gary Pavlovich <glpavlovich@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Jacob,
>> 
>> Correction; the Syntech 20-50 IS a full synthetic...I guess the e-mail went
>> out before I could delete and re-write.
>> 
>> Anyhow, a full synthetic usually finds all the small/micro gaps in our
>> gaskets...but that is with zero to 5W oils; this being a 20-50W should not
>> pose a real problem but with your mileage you may want to run the ZDDP
>> additives.  Do a cost analysis for the miles you drive and if they are low
>> miles you may want to continue using your current oil with the ZDDP
>> additives on the market and save the full synthetic oil for after a rebuild.
>> 
>> Gary P.
>> 
>> -----Original Message----- From: Gary Pavlovich
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 9:06 PM
>> To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: zddp
>> 
>> Jacob,
>> 
>> Syntech is not a full synthetic but a blend; not a problem with your engine.
>> Gary
>> 
>> -----Original Message----- From: Jacob Fox
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 8:18 PM
>> To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: zddp
>> 
>> From what I see castrol did it right with that 20-50 oil. A guy I work with
>> swore by pennzoil...well he removed his oil pan today in his 98 Durango
>> cause of a blown motor to find nothing but sludge...and that's with 3k oil
>> changes!!!! Def never using that stuff. I've always used castrol...I wanna
>> find a oil in the stores I just hate ordering stuff...shipping prices are
>> ridiculous and it takes forever. Ive just always been so worried about
>> switching to 20-50 especially a synthetic. It's never below freezing down
>> here...maybe one day in January MAYBE. idk...if someone wants to give an
>> honest opinion let me know...I wanna do what's best for that ol' gal! I'm
>> going on a roadtrip this weekend to see how she does. Only driving an HR
>> away but I wanna make sure I'm not gonna run into any problems..
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>> On Sep 14, 2011, at 9:54 PM, Doug J <63sprtfury@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>>> Time for me to change oil in the '63 too.  Can't bring myself to run
>>> castrol.  I know we've beaten this subject to death, but one more
>>> time, is there an oil out there with the right additives? Or,
>>> what/where do we find the additive.  Product name?
>>> Thanx
>> 
> 
> -- 
> --
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person. That is, send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!
> 
> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
> http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
> http://groups.google.com/group/1962to1965mopars?hl=en.

-- 
--
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person. That is, send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content signal to Mopar topic.  Thanks!

1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
http://groups.google.com/group/1962to1965mopars?hl=en.