From: Bill Watson <chrycoman@xxxxxxxxx>
To: 1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 3:15 AM
Subject: Re: Random Bad Thoughts
There's a lot more than just "Polar Ice" involved. Take a look at
Greenland. That is one massive island covered in snow and glaciers.
All of it above sea level. Take a look at Antarctica. Again, one
massive land mass, all above sea
level.
All of that ice and snow is melting, and when it does melt it flows
into the oceans. All that water being added to the ocean has to
affect the water levels.
It took a few million years to produce the oil we are using now. And
it took more than just a graveyard of dead bodies to produce it, with
pressure being the big factor. So the earth is not regenerating oil.
We not be discovering new sources of oil that did not exist before.
And, no, they are not finding new oil in dry wells. What they do is
fill the old "dry" wells with water and, as oil floats on water, any
oil they could not pump out comes up as the well is filled. As for
crude on the surface of the Gulf of Mexico, given the oil rig disaster
a few years ago I would be astonished if they were not finding oil
slicks.
Bill
Toronto, ON
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:44 PM, Cory Rempel <
cory_383@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Speaking of B.S. and lies, has any one heard the theory that the planet
> somehow makes it's own oil? I heard on the radio that scientists are
> finding oil wells that use to be dry are now producing oil. Yeah, you me
> right. The earth is like every animal on the planet. It produces its own
> blood, for a better term. If this is true we WILL NOT run out of
> oil.....ever!! I mean come on. Flesh turning into oil seams really far
> fetched to me. If that was the case, we'd be finding way more dino bones
> than we have to date. Plus if you read up on grave robbing and other such
> activities, you don't read about oil being found in grave yards.
> One more thing about "global warming". How is it possible for flooding
to
> take place if the polar ice melts? I learned in grade 3 that water expands
> when it freezes and contracts when it melts. So if the ice melts, would not
> the water level go down? Seems like grade 3 science is being forgotten by a
> crap load of people.
> ________________________________
> Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 19:21:53 -0700
> From:
rlipinski3@xxxxxxx> To:
1962to1965mopars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Random Bad Thoughts
>
> Good points...we need alt fuel cars...because we are running out of oil....
>
> Proven lie..so....
>
> we need alt fuel cars because CO2 is a deadly pollutant and is heating the
> planet...
>
> CO2
is an earth life gas and bull crap on the heating...algore wants money
>
> you have alt fuel vehicles because the nanny state says that is what's
> needed....
>
> It is pure B.S. unless it is allowed to happen.....
>
> Our 65 sat is our scare ourselves silly car because 67 and later are
> emissions tested in AZ.
>
> the EPA is allowed to operate by executive orders and not law.....maybe time
> to get the
> bastages that are targeting our cars and guns out of there.......
>
> rob/ferts/phx
> 65 sat
>
>
>
>
> On 8/22/11 7:00 AM,
Dodger7998@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
> It is always a cool/nice/great thought when we hear how someone plans of
> building/restoring or passing on their 63 Fury, or whatever car with/to
> their
kids/grandkids. The bad thought is that our cars are 46+ years old,
> and I have a feeling that the future of the fossil fueled vehicles will come
> to an end before our cars see another 40 years, The thought of a 65 AWB
> car with a trunk full of alkaline batteries with a multi-winding electric
> motor topped off with a 6-pak of relays is just not an appealing thought to
> me.,,,,
> I am 66 years old, and will hopefully not live long enough to see it
> but do see the banning of a fossil fueled vehicle even being owned with out
> having a special collectors permit, and even then they will not be allowed
> to be started or driven (if you can find the fuel) because of air
> pollution. I am far from an environmentalist, nor do I know any, but have
> a feeling that it would be wise for all of us to start
getting involved,
> just so we can get some input into what they will eventually be doing to
> wipe out our hobbies and loves,,,,,
>
>
> --
> --
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --
> directly to that person. That is, send parts/car transactions and
> negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended
> recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect
> your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content
> signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
>
> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
>
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
>
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
>
http://groups.google.com/group/1962to1965mopars?hl=en.
>
> --
> --
> Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person --
> directly to that person. That is, send parts/car transactions and
> negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended
> recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect
> your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the content
> signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
>
> 1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
>
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
>
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
>
http://groups.google.com/group/1962to1965mopars?hl=en.
>
--
--
Please address private mail -- mail of interest to only one person -- directly to that person. That is, send parts/car transactions and negotiations as well as other personal messages only to the intended recipient, not to the Clubhouse public address. This practice will protect your privacy, reduce the total volume of mail and fine tune the
content signal to Mopar topic. Thanks!
1962 to 1965 Mopar Clubhouse Discussion Guidelines:
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.org/mletiq.html and
http://www.1962to1965mopar.ornocar.com/general_disclaimer.html.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 1962 to 1965 Mopar Mail List Clubhouse" group.
http://groups.google.com/group/1962to1965mopars?hl=en.
Back to the Home of the Forward Look Network